Accuracy-Based Vitamin D Survey: Six Years of Quality Improvement Guided by Proficiency Testing.

Arch Pathol Lab Med

From the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Dr Erdman); Regional Reference Labs, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, North Hollywood (Dr Palmer-Toy); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Horowitz); and the Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Hoofnagle).

Published: December 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The College of American Pathologists Accuracy-Based Proficiency Testing Program aims to enhance the quality and standardization of clinical lab results through rigorous proficiency testing.
  • The first six years of the Accuracy-Based Vitamin D Survey were summarized, highlighting the performance of various assays against a reference method and revealing varying biases and correlations among different testing methods.
  • Results showed significant biases in vitamin D assays, stressing the need for continuous improvement in laboratory practices to enhance patient care based on findings from this testing program.

Article Abstract

Context.—: The goal of the College of American Pathologists Accuracy-Based Proficiency Testing Program is to promote the quality, standardization, and harmonization of clinical laboratory results through proficiency testing specimens that are free from matrix effects, have target values that are traceable to reference methods, and that probe the limitations of current methods.

Objective.—: To summarize the first 6 years of the Accuracy-Based Vitamin D Survey and highlight key insights from the data generated as it relates to assay performance.

Design.—: Accuracy-based challenges were created by using pooled human serum samples. Certain samples were derived from participants in an institutional review board-approved protocol in which vitamin D-deficient participants were treated with ergocalciferol (vitamin D). Reference targets for the survey were set by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Each method was compared with the reference method procedure over the course of the program (n = 43 proficiency testing samples).

Results.—: Linear regression versus the reference method procedure revealed proportional biases across the methods, ranging from 0.0% to 16.7%. Pearson correlation coefficients () ranged from 0.902 to 0.996. Results were influenced by the concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D as well as the C-3 epimer of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. During the 6 years, 2 manufacturers altered their assays to match the reference method procedure more closely.

Conclusions.—: There is considerable bias, both proportional bias and sample-specific matrix effects, affecting many assays. This ongoing accuracy-based proficiency testing program for vitamin D will provide the data needed for laboratories and manufacturers to improve their assays and thereby patient care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0625-CPDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

proficiency testing
20
reference method
12
method procedure
12
accuracy-based vitamin
8
vitamin survey
8
accuracy-based proficiency
8
testing program
8
matrix effects
8
accuracy-based
5
proficiency
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!