A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Comparison of Influence of Susceptibility Artifact due to Metallic Embolic Material in MRA Image]. | LitMetric

[Comparison of Influence of Susceptibility Artifact due to Metallic Embolic Material in MRA Image].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi

Central Division of Radiology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University.

Published: August 2019

Purpose: To identify the influence of susceptibility artifact caused by commonly used trans-catheter embolic devices for vascular lesions in the body on the images of various magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) techniques as an aid to patient screening after endovascular embolization.

Materials And Methods: We constructed vascular phantoms in which three embolic materials; platinum coil, Inconel coil, and vascular plug, were placed. Each phantom was imaged with three types of MRA techniques as follows: ultra-short echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE), three-dimensional fast advanced spin echo (3D-FASE), time-resolved contrast MRA with key hole technique (Key hole). For each embolic material, four reviewers compared the visual capabilities of the vessel lumen and surrounding area of each MRA technique by using a four-point visual scoring system. The quantitative values of susceptibility artifacts generated from each embolic material were compared between each MRA technique.

Results: For all MRA techniques, the platinum coil showed the highest visual score (median=four-point) among all the embolic materials (p<0.05). In the platinum coil, the MR signal in the coil was clearly depicted in UTE. For all MRA technique, the quantitative values of the susceptibility artifacts were the lowest in platinum coil among all the embolic materials (p<0.05).

Conclusion: UTE is less susceptible to susceptibility artifact of embolic materials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2019_JSRT_75.5.460DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

embolic material
12
mra techniques
12
influence susceptibility
8
susceptibility artifact
8
magnetic resonance
8
embolic materials
8
platinum coil
8
key hole
8
mra
7
embolic
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!