Purpose: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP).

Methods: Using a modified CISNET breast cancer simulation model, we estimated outcomes for women aged 40-64 years associated with three scenarios: breast cancer screening within the NBCCEDP, screening in the absence of the NBCCEDP (no program), and no screening through any program. We report screening outcomes, cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and sensitivity analyses results.

Results: Compared with no program and no screening, the NBCCEDP lowers breast cancer mortality and improves QALYs, but raises health care costs. Base-case ICER for the program was $51,754/QALY versus no program and $50,223/QALY versus no screening. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis ICER for the program was $56,615/QALY [95% CI $24,069, $134,230/QALY] versus no program and $51,096/QALY gained [95% CI $26,423, $97,315/QALY] versus no screening.

Conclusions: On average, breast cancer screening in the NBCCEDP was cost-effective compared with no program or no screening.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613985PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01178-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
24
cancer screening
16
screening nbccedp
12
program screening
12
screening
10
program
10
cost-effectiveness breast
8
cancer
8
screening national
8
national breast
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!