The MOVEMENT study was designed to assess the effectiveness of monthly intravenous ibandronate on bone mineral density (BMD) in daily clinical practice in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis whose lumbar spine BMD did not increase despite oral bisphosphonate therapy. This study was a multicenter, prospective, interventional study (52 sites; August 2015 to March 2018). Patients aged ≥ 50 years with primary osteoporosis, evaluated as low responders to oral bisphosphonate treatment for 1-3 years, continued on their existing oral bisphosphonate or switched to monthly intravenous ibandronate (1 mg) for 12 months. The primary endpoint was change in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to 12 months in the intravenous ibandronate group (IV IBN). A total of 240 and 141 patients were enrolled in the IV IBN and oral bisphosphonate groups (OBP), respectively. At 12 months, a significant increase in mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD was observed in the IV IBN (2.70%). This change was also significant at 6 months (1.92%). Similarly, the change in total hip BMD showed a significant increase at 12 months (0.78%). In the IV IBN, the responder rate, percentage of patient whose change from baseline of lumbar spine BMD has greater than 0%, for lumbar spine BMD was high at both 6 (72.3%, 141/195 patients) and 12 (78.0%, 145/186 patients) months. No new safety concerns were observed in either treatment group. Treatment with intravenous ibandronate significantly increased lumbar spine BMD without any new safety concerns in Japanese patients with osteoporosis who showed low response to existing oral bisphosphonates.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00774-019-01005-z | DOI Listing |
Neurospine
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Our research examines the learning curves of various minimally invasive lumbar surgeries to determine the benefits and challenges they pose to both surgeons and patients. The advent of microsurgical techniques since the 1960s, including advances in fluoroscopic navigation and intraoperative computed tomography, has significantly shifted spinal surgery from open to minimally invasive methods. This study critically evaluates surgical duration, intraoperative conversions to open surgery, and complications as primary parameters to gauge these learning curves.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurospine
December 2024
Spine Department and Deformities, Interbalkan European Medical Center, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Objective: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) represents an increasingly encountered condition in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of the present study is to assess the progress of health-related quality of life following transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) for LDH in patients suffering from RA.
Methods: Seventy-four patients, scheduled to undergo elective TELD for LDH, were prospectively enrolled in the study.
Neurospine
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Objective: Uniportal full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (FE-TLIF) carries a unique risk of nerve traction and abrasion injury during cage insertion. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the GUARD technique and delayed ligamentum flavectomy in reducing postoperative radicular pain and neurapraxia in patients undergoing uniportal FE-TLIF.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 45 patients with an average age of 53.
Neurospine
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Objective: To compare the safety profiles of biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) and microscopic spinal surgery (MSS) for lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis by analyzing the associated adverse events.
Methods: We pooled data from 2 prospective randomized controlled trials involving 220 patients (110 in each group) who underwent single-level lumbar surgery. Participants aged 20-80 years with radiating pain due to lumbar disc herniation or spinal stenosis were included in this study.
Neurospine
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Objective: Spinal stenosis is a prevalent condition; however, the optimal surgical treatment for central lumbar stenosis remains controversial. This study compared the clinical outcomes and radiological parameters of 3 surgical.
Methods: unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression with unilateral biportal endoscopy (ULBD-UBE), conventional subtotal laminectomy (STL), and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!