Existing evidence shows that restrictive blood transfusion is safe and may avert potential harm associated with more liberal transfusion strategies. A significant number of patients are being both unnecessarily transfused and over-transfused for their age, diagnosis and comorbidities. We describe the implementation of a behavioural strategy through educational sessions and the provision of individualised patient-centred advice, offering haematinic investigation and supplementation where appropriate. We compared our interventional data with a retrospective analysis of patients receiving blood transfusion for number of units transfused, haemoglobin triggers and incidence of haematinic investigations. The data were also analysed for patient length of stay and cost effectiveness. There was a significant reduction in the number of red cell units transfused across all specialties (p=0.003). In total, 431 units were transfused in the interventional group compared with 571 in the control group. There was a significant reduction in over-transfusion (p=0.003). Patients undergoing haematinic testing increased by 16.6% (p=0.0002). There was no change in length of hospital stay and our strategy has been shown to not only be cost effective, but provide significant monetary saving. Our patient-centred approach, through clinician engagement and challenging outdated behaviours, has been shown to significantly reduce inappropriate blood transfusions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6465804PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-169DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood transfusion
12
units transfused
12
red cell
8
transfusion
5
challenging blood
4
transfusion practice
4
practice targeted
4
targeted behavioural
4
behavioural intervention
4
intervention red
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!