Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To evaluate the clinical impact of Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography on the planned management of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after surgery.
Methods: We enrolled 276 prostate cancer patients referred to Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography due to biochemical recurrence after surgery (two consecutive prostate-specific antigen assays ≥0.2 ng/mL). First, the detection rate of Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography was assessed according to different prostate-specific antigen levels. Second, the independent predictors of Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography positive results were assessed. Finally, the intended treatment before revision of Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography was assessed by a multidisciplinary team based on the European Association of Urology guidelines, patient clinical condition and clinical parameters. Then, re-assessment of the treatment plan was prospectively recorded by the same board after revision of Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography. The effective clinical impact of Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography was rated as major (change in therapeutic approach), minor (same treatment, but modified therapeutic strategy) or none.
Results: The overall detection rate of Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography was 47.5%. Prostate-specific antigen at Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (odds ratio 3.52) and prostate-specific antigen doubling time <3 months (odds ratio 3.98) were independent predictors of positive Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography results (all P ≤ 0.03). Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography led to a major treatment change in 177 cases (64.1%), with a minor clinical impact of 2.5%. The overall clinical impact of Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography was 42.4%, 27.7%, 21.2% and 8.7% in men with prostate-specific antigen at Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography of 0.2-0.4, 0.5-1, 1.1-2 and >2 ng/mL, respectively.
Conclusions: Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography allows clinicians to radically change the intended treatment approach before imaging evaluation, in roughly two out three individuals.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.14012 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!