Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Fire is an important disturbance agent in Chinese boreal forests but the long-term effects of wildfires on soil nitrogen (N) net mineralisation rates (R) in natural versus human-assisted restorations are not well understood. In this study, we analysed upper (0-10cm) and lower layer (10-20cm) soil samples from natural restoration and afforestation plots in a Dahurian larch (Larix gmelinii) forest in north-eastern China 29years after a mega fire disturbance. Our results showed that the soil inorganic N (NH-N and NO-N) pool of the upper and lower layers of the regenerated plots remained significantly lower than in unburned control plots. This suggests that the effects of a high burn severity fire on soil N availability were still significant almost 30years after the event. Restoration type (natural restoration versus afforestation) also had significant effects on upper layer soil N availability; compared with afforestation, natural restoration was more beneficial for the accumulation of soil inorganic N and the recovery of R after fire disturbance. Specifically, the concentration of inorganic N and the mean R in upper layer soils in the natural restoration plots were approximately 41% greater and 3.6 times greater, respectively, than in the afforestation plots. The differences in soil N availability between the two restoration types were attributed to differences in soil water content (SWC), soil microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and the recovery of vegetation after the fire disturbance. Our study demonstrates that natural restoration has proved more successful than afforestation in countering soil N losses in boreal forests in China resulting from a high burn severity fire disturbance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.008 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!