A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Rate of missed oesophageal cancer at routine endoscopy and survival outcomes: A multicentric cohort study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study found that missed oesophageal cancer (MEC) occurs in 6.4% of diagnosed cases, highlighting a need for improved detection methods.
  • MEC is more likely to be smaller and less frequently metastasized at diagnosis compared to other types of oesophageal cancer (non-MEC).
  • The research indicates that the overall survival rates for MEC and non-MEC patients after two years are similar, emphasizing the need for better endoscopy practices to improve outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background: Missed oesophageal cancer (MEC) at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is poorly documented.

Objective: The objectives of this study were: (1) to assess the rate, predictors and survival of MEC; (2) to compare MEC and non-MEC tumours.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at four tertiary centres. Oesophageal cancers (ECs) diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 were included. Patients with a premalignant condition (Barrett, achalasia), prior diagnosis of EC or oesophagogastric junction tumour of gastric origin were excluded. MEC was defined as EC detected within 36 months after negative UGE.

Results: 123,395 UGEs were performed during the study period, with 502 ECs being diagnosed (0.4%). A total of 391 ECs were finally included. Overall MEC rate was 6.4% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 4.4-9.3%). The interval between negative and diagnostic UGE was less than 2 years in 84% of the cases. Multivariate analysis showed that a negative endoscopy was associated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and less experienced endoscopists. MEC was smaller than non-MEC at diagnosis (25 versus 40 mm,  = 0.021), more often flat or depressed ( = 0.013) and less frequently diagnosed as metastatic disease ( = 0.013). Overall 2-year survival rate was similar for MEC (20%) and non-MEC (24.1%) ( = 0.95).

Conclusions: MEC accounted for 6.4% of all ECs and was associated with poor survival. High-quality UGE and awareness of MEC may help to reduce its incidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6498796PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640618811477DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mec
9
missed oesophageal
8
oesophageal cancer
8
cohort study
8
ecs diagnosed
8
rate
4
rate missed
4
cancer routine
4
routine endoscopy
4
survival
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!