AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focused on identifying factors influencing patient satisfaction after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT).
  • A total of 49 out of 130 patients who underwent MAT participated in the study, completing various satisfaction and outcome evaluation forms along with strength assessments.
  • Results indicated that the IKDC score was significantly associated with patient satisfaction, highlighting the importance of subjective outcomes in evaluating surgical success.

Article Abstract

Background: This study aimed to identify the factors associated with patient satisfaction with the outcome of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT).

Materials And Methods: Patients treated with MAT from March 2006 to May 2009 were asked to complete a five-point Likert scale regarding satisfaction with the outcome of MAT, in addition to the following subjective outcome evaluation forms: the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective forms, Knee Society Score knee and function forms, and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale. We collected radiologic data using X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging and assessed isokinetic muscle strength test using the Biodex System 3. We investigated whether these parameters were significantly associated with patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis was computed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Among the 130 patients who underwent MAT, 49 participated in the interview and were included in this study. The mean followup period was 50.4 months. Mean patient age was 40 (±9) years; 33 were male and 16 were female (33%). The lateral meniscus was transplanted in 13 (27%) patients, while the medial meniscus was involved in 36 (73%) patients. On univariate analysis, sex and isokinetic extension strength deficit at 60° and 180° as well as the IKDC, Knee Society, and Lysholm scores showed significant association with patient satisfaction regarding the outcome. On multivariable logistic regression, only the IKDC score showed a significant association, with = 0.04.

Conclusions: The study results support the importance of patient-reported subjective outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction following a surgical procedure. Regarding MAT, the IKDC outcome score reflects patient satisfaction.

Level Of Evidence: Level III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6501627PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_244_18DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient satisfaction
20
satisfaction outcome
12
international knee
8
knee documentation
8
documentation committee
8
meniscal allograft
8
allograft transplantation
8
associated patient
8
knee society
8
multivariable logistic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!