Impact of MELD Score-Based Organ Allocation on Mortality, Bleeding, and Transfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Before-and-After Observational Cohort Study.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

Department of Anesthesiology and Department of Medicine, Critical Care Division, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Published: October 2019

Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-based allocation system on mortality, bleeding, and transfusion requirement in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Design: OLTs were studied for this observational study (before-and-after observational cohort study).

Setting: One community hospital.

Participants: The study comprised 686 patients who underwent 750 consecutive OLTs.

Intervention: None.

Measurements And Main Results: Patients who underwent OLT in the MELD era had an adjusted lower 1-year mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.45 [0.24-0.83]) compared with patients who underwent OLT the pre-MELD era. No significant difference in 1-month mortality was observed. Other variables with a significant effect on 1-year mortality in multivariate analysis were preoperative international normalized ratio, intraoperative use of a phlebotomy, total intraoperative volume of crystalloid infused, and retransplantation. Blood loss was greater in the MELD era (median difference 200 mL; p < 0.001), as were red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate transfusions. More patients in the MELD era received at least 1 transfusion (27% v 20%; p = 0.024).

Conclusion: The MELD allocation system did not affect 1-month mortality, but a decrease in 1-year mortality was demonstrated. Blood loss and transfusions increased during OLTs performed in the MELD era. The role of other variables should be explored further to explain postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

meld era
16
patients underwent
12
1-year mortality
12
mortality
8
mortality bleeding
8
bleeding transfusion
8
liver transplantation
8
before-and-after observational
8
observational cohort
8
allocation system
8

Similar Publications

Background: In July 2023, the OPTN adopted MELD3.0 to address sex-based disparities in liver transplantation (LT) opportunity and waitlist mortality. No studies have proven that MELD3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

End-stage liver disease is arguably one of the leading burdensome diseases among developing countries such as the Philippines. Although liver transplantation is considered the treatment of choice for decompensated cirrhosis, the establishment of a robust transplant program locally has been protracted as numerous obstacles continue to plague our transplant landscape. Issues on cost, options of having the transplant done overseas, and low rates of deceased donation are some of the difficulties that hamper our program's progress and development.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Liver transplants (LTs) are prioritized by mortality risk, which is estimated by MELD scores. Since hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients present with lower MELD scores, they are allocated MELD exception points. Concerns persist that HCC recipients are over-prioritized, resulting in disproportionate waitlist mortality among non-HCC patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Multiple studies have shown good results with the use of octogenarian donors in non-HCV recipients and its use is universally accepted worldwide. There are no studies analyzing differences between hepatitis C virus (HCV) and non-HCV recipients transplanted with donors≥80 years in the direct-action antivirals (DAA) period. The rate of liver transplantation (LT) using old donors is still low, and a change in the acceptance of these grafts could increase the liver pool available for LT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Open offers (OOs) in liver transplantation (LT) result from bypassing the traditional allocation system. Little is known about the trends of OOs or the differences in donor/recipient characteristics compared to traditionally placed organs. We aim to quantify modern practices regarding OOs and understand NMP's impact, focusing on social determinants of health (SDH), cost, and graft-associated risk.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!