Zwaan et al. and others discuss the importance of the inevitable differences between a replication experiment and the corresponding original experiment. But these discussions are not informed by a principled, quantitative framework for taking differences into account. Bayesian confirmation theory provides such a framework. It will not entirely solve the problem, but it will lead to new insights.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000699 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!