There are no clear criteria regarding what kind of beliefs should count as folk-economic beliefs (FEBs), or any way to make an exhaustive list that could be filtered through such criteria. This allows the target article authors, Boyer & Petersen, to cherry-pick FEBs, which results in the omission of some well-established FEBs. The authors do not sufficiently address a strong relationship between ideology and FEBs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18000316 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Social finance as cultural evolution, transmission bias, and market dynamics.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
June 2021
Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, CA 92617
The thoughts and behaviors of financial market participants depend upon adopted cultural traits, including information signals, beliefs, strategies, and folk economic models. Financial traits compete to survive in the human population and are modified in the process of being transmitted from one agent to another. These cultural evolutionary processes shape market outcomes, which in turn feed back into the success of competing traits.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCommentary: Folk-Economic Beliefs: An Evolutionary Cognitive Model.
Front Psychol
June 2018
Department of Management, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Zero-sum thinking and economic policy.
Behav Brain Sci
January 2018
Department of Economics, Emory University,Atlanta,GA
A main tenet of folk economics is the assumption that the world is zero-sum. Many implications stem from this assumption. These include: beliefs regarding taxation; beliefs regarding economic regulation; beliefs regarding inequality; and the core of Marxist economics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDo the folk actually hold folk-economic beliefs?
Behav Brain Sci
January 2018
ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders,Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London,Egham,Surrey TW20 0EX,United
Boyer & Petersen (B&P) argue that folk-economic beliefs are widespread - shaped by evolved cognitive systems - and they offer exemplar beliefs to illustrate their thesis. In this commentary, we highlight evidence of substantial variation in one of these exemplars: beliefs about immigration. Contra claims by B&P, we argue that the balance of this evidence suggests the "folk" may actually hold positive beliefs about the economic impact of immigration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe challenge of accounting for individual differences in folk-economic beliefs.
Behav Brain Sci
January 2018
Department of Psychology, Cornell University,Ithaca,NY
We argue that existing data on folk-economic beliefs (FEBs) present challenges to Boyer & Petersen's model. Specifically, the widespread individual variation in endorsement of FEBs casts doubt on the claim that humans are evolutionarily predisposed towards particular economic beliefs. Additionally, the authors' model cannot account for the systematic covariance between certain FEBs, such as those observed in distinct political ideologies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!