Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
As the largest and most superficial organ, the skin is well positioned for receiving sensory information from the environment. It is conceivable that changes in posture could result in deformations of the skin and subsequent changes in skin material properties. Specifically, the ankle and metatarsophalangeal joints have the capability to undergo large postural alterations with the potential to induce large structural deformations in the skin of the foot. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which alterations in foot posture may influence measures of foot sole and dorsum skin stretch, hardness, and thickness in vivo. Ten young and healthy individuals were tested while three static foot postures (plantar flexion, neutral and dorsiflexion) were maintained passively. Skin stretch deformation was quantified across each posture using an 11 × 4 point matrix of 3D kinematic markers affixed to the skin of the foot sole and dorsum. Skin hardness was assessed across each posture at specific locations of the foot sole (1st metatarsal, 5th metatarsal, medial arch, lateral arch and heel) and foot dorsum (proximal, middle and distal) using a handheld Shore durometer. Skin (epidermal + dermal) thickness was measured in each posture from the same test locations using ultrasound images obtained for the foot sole and dorsum. In the plantar flexion ankle posture, the foot sole skin was observed to relax/retract on average (± standard errorr of the mean (SEM) by 9 ± 2% to become both 20 ± 6% softer and 10 ± 6% thicker. In this posture, the foot dorsum skin stretched on average by 7 ± 2% resulting in 84 ± 8% harder and 5 ± 4% thinner skin. In the dorsiflexion ankle posture, the skin of the foot sole was observed to stretch on average by 5 ± 1% to become both 20 ± 8% harder and 4 ± 7% thinner. In this posture, the skin of the foot dorsum relaxed/retracted on average by 9 ± 1% resulting in the skin becoming 27 ± 12% softer and 7 ± 5% thicker. Notably, all of the sites responded with movement in a similar direction, but each site responded to a variable extent. Importantly, it was clear that the majority of skin structural deformation of the foot sole occurred within the 1st metatarsal, 5th metatarsal, and medial arch regions, while deformation was more evenly distributed across regions of the foot dorsum. The results suggest there is location specificity in the retraction and stretch characteristics of the foot skin. While not tested directly, this may suggest that local stretch distributions could be in part due to the underlying dermal and hypodermal structures in these foot regions. With these observed changes in the mechanical structure of the foot sole and dorsum skin tissue matrix, it is possible that corresponding posture-dependent changes in cutaneous mechanoreceptor activation may be present.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.012 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!