Propofol Versus Dexmedetomidine for Procedural Sedation in a Pediatric Population.

South Med J

From the Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters, Norfolk, Virginia, the Department of Emergency Medicine Residency, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, and the Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.

Published: May 2019

Objectives: Frequently, infants and children require sedation to facilitate noninvasive procedures and imaging studies. Propofol and dexmedetomidine are used to achieve deep procedural sedation in children. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical safety and efficacy of propofol versus dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients undergoing sedation in a pediatric sedation unit.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients sedated with either propofol or dexmedetomidine in a pediatric sedation unit by pediatric emergency physicians was performed. Both medications were dosed per protocol with propofol 2 mg/kg induction and 150 μg · kg · min maintenance and dexmedetomidine 3 μg/kg induction for 10 minutes and 2 μg · kg · hmaintenance. The variables collected included drug dose, sedation time (time that the drug was given to the completion of the procedure), recovery time (end of the study to the return to the presedation sedation score for 15 minutes), need for dose rate changes, airway management, and adverse events.

Results: A total of 2432 children were included- 1503 who received propofol and 929 who received dexmedetomidine. Propofol and dexmedetomidine resulted in successful completion of the study in 98.8% and 99.7%, respectively ( = 0.02). The mean recovery time for propofol was 34.3 minutes, compared with 65.6 minutes for dexmedetomidine ( < 0.001). The need for unexpected airway management was 9.7% for propofol and 2.2% for dexmedetomidine ( < 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 8.6% and 6% of patients in the propofol and dexmedetomidine groups, respectively ( = 0.02).

Conclusions: Propofol use led to significantly shorter recovery times, with an increased need for airway management, but rates of bag-mask ventilation (2.3%), airway obstruction (1.1%), and desaturation (1.6%) were low. No patients required intubation. Propofol is a reasonable alternative to dexmedetomidine, with a clinically acceptable safety profile.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000973DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

propofol dexmedetomidine
16
propofol
12
airway management
12
dexmedetomidine
11
propofol versus
8
versus dexmedetomidine
8
sedation
8
procedural sedation
8
sedation pediatric
8
dexmedetomidine pediatric
8

Similar Publications

Continuous Infusion of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine should not be the First Choice to Prevent Postoperative Delirium after Hip Fracture.

Indian J Crit Care Med

January 2025

Resistant Schizophrenia Consultation, Hospital Júlio de Matos, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de L, Lisboa, Portugal.

Finsterer J, Marques JG. Continuous Infusion of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine should not be the First Choice to Prevent Postoperative Delirium after Hip Fracture. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(1):86-87.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ekkapat G, Chokengarmwong N. Author Response: Continuous Infusion of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine should not be the First Choice to Prevent Postoperative Delirium in Patients after Hip Fracture. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(1):88-89.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intraoperative awareness, without explicit recall, occurs after induction of anaesthesia in approximately 10% of persons under 40 yr of age. Most anaesthetic agents minimally suppress the noradrenergic system. We hypothesised that addition of dexmedetomidine, which suppresses noradrenergic activity, may reduce encephalographic (EEG) arousal in response to tracheal intubation; such an effect would lay the foundation for future studies of dexmedetomidine in reducing intraoperative awareness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate the perioperative efficacy of a modified supratemporal retrobulbar block in dogs undergoing ocular surgery.

Materials And Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, dogs were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg im) and methadone (0.1 mg/kg im), induced with propofol to effect and maintained with isoflurane (FE'Iso 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Perioperative respiratory adverse event (PRAE) is one of the most common complications in pediatric anesthesia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative pharmacological interventions to prevent the development of PRAE in children undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!