AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how certain surgical techniques and instruments affect intraocular pressure (IOP) and the rate of suprachoroidal hemorrhage (SCH) during 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (25G-PPV).
  • A total of 3,034 patients were analyzed, divided into four groups based on the surgical procedures performed, such as fluid-air exchange and vitreous shaving under scleral depression.
  • Results showed a higher incidence of SCH in patients undergoing fluid-air exchange and vitreous shaving, particularly in group four, which combined both techniques, although most cases were localized and did not lead to severe complications.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the influence of surgical procedures and instruments that are associated with intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations on the incidence of suprachoroidal hemorrhage (SCH) during 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (25G-PPV), and to investigate the clinical features of SCH during 25G-PPV.

Design: Retrospective, comparative case series.

Participants: A total of 3034 cases that underwent initial 25G-PPV at a single surgical center.

Methods: Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate the relationships between the incidence of SCH during 25G-PPV and the surgical procedures and instruments that were associated with IOP fluctuations. The participants were divided into 4 groups that underwent the following procedures: neither fluid-air exchange nor vitreous shaving under scleral depression (group 1, n = 1144); fluid-air exchange alone (group 2, n = 463); vitreous shaving under scleral depression alone (group 3, n = 639); and both procedures (group 4, n = 788). The incidence of SCH in each group was compared. The clinical features and surgical outcomes of SCH during 25G-PPV were also investigated.

Main Outcome Measures: The incidence of SCH during 25G-PPV and the clinical features and surgical outcomes of SCH during 25G-PPV.

Results: The incidence of SCH was significantly higher in cases that underwent fluid-air exchange (P = 0.0047) or vitreous shaving under scleral depression (P = 0.0157). There were no significant relationships between the incidence of SCH and the use of surgical instruments. The incidence of SCH in group 4 (8/788, 1.02%) was significantly higher than that in groups 1 (1/1144, 0.09%), 2 (0/463, 0%), and 3 (0/639, 0%) (P = 0.01). Almost all SCH cases were localized, and there were no cases of SCH involving the posterior pole. Of all the SCH cases, only one case required reoperation for retinal redetachment. No cases required secondary surgical management for SCH.

Conclusions: There remains a slight risk of SCH during 25G-PPV in cases that require both fluid-air exchange and vitreous shaving under scleral depression. Even if SCH occurs during 25G-PPV, the surgical outcomes after SCH may not be substantially worse.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2018.01.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

incidence sch
24
sch
16
sch 25g-ppv
16
fluid-air exchange
16
vitreous shaving
16
shaving scleral
16
scleral depression
16
group n =
16
surgical procedures
12
procedures instruments
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!