Most research suggests that humans can optimize their behavior by imitating other humans. However, it remains unclear whether humans actually imitate others in real-life situations. To address this question, we conducted spatial public goods experiments with voluntary participation. In direct contrast to the prevailing view, the results of our experiments show that imitation plays an insignificant role in the decision making process. Furthermore, we found that the nature of human decision making relied more on their performances in the game's earlier history rather than the performance they observed in others. The action that gained better results in one's own history had a higher chance to be adopted even if this action did not work for the others.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5081935 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!