Perioperative Vasopressor Use in Free Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Reconstr Microsurg

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Published: September 2019

Background:  The use of vasopressors in free flap surgery has traditionally been avoided due to the presumed risk of pedicle vasospasm leading to flap failure. However, there is a lack of strong clinical evidence to suggest that their administration during microvascular surgery is absolutely contraindicated. The aim of this study is to clarify the impact of perioperative vasopressor use on free flap outcomes.

Methods:  A systematic review was performed of all English-language articles that have compared free flap outcomes between patients who received vasopressors and those who did not. The outcome measures were total flap failure, pedicle thrombosis, and overall flap complications. Meta-analysis was performed using Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects and DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models.

Results:  From a total of 130 citations, 14 studies representing 8,653 cases were analyzed. Majority of these did not find any negative effects of vasopressor use irrespective of dose, timing of administration, and method of delivery. Meta-analysis demonstrated that vasopressors were associated with less total flap failure overall (odds ratio, [OR]: 0.71,  = 0.05) and less pedicle thrombosis in head and neck reconstruction specifically (OR: 0.58,  = 0.02). Flap complication rates were similar across all defect types (OR: 0.97,  = 0.81) but appeared to be increased in breast reconstruction (OR: 1.46,  = 0.01).

Conclusion:  Perioperative vasopressor administration does not appear to be as detrimental to free flap survival as has been previously feared. Their role in optimizing hemodynamic stability may have a more beneficial effect on overall flap perfusion and in minimizing the complications of iatrogenic fluid overload.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1687914DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

free flap
20
flap failure
12
flap
11
perioperative vasopressor
8
vasopressor free
8
flap surgery
8
systematic review
8
total flap
8
pedicle thrombosis
8
free
5

Similar Publications

Free medial sural artery perforator flap for soft tissue defects in the hand: a cadaver study.

Hand Surg Rehabil

December 2024

Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Centre Chirurgical Émile Gallé, Nancy University Hospital, 49 rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France; Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lorraine, 9 Av. de la Forêt de Haye, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. Electronic address:

We carried out a cadaver study using 10 fresh-frozen adult legs and hands to explore technical feasibility and reproducibility of the free Medial Sural Artery Perforator flap and its applicability for covering soft tissue defects in the hand. A mean of 2 cutaneous perforators (1-4) were found. Each flap had a pedicle composed of a main perforator that arose from the medial sural artery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Virtual surgical planning (VSP) allows for optimal reconstruction of maxillary defects with fibula free flaps. Current data are limited regarding long-term complications of patient-specific plates (PSPs) in this setting. Our objective was to determine long-term complications of PSPs in maxillary reconstruction using fibula free flaps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive abilities of the 5-item modified Frailty Index (5-mFI), Prognostic Nutrition Index (PNI), and their combination in older adult patients undergoing oral cancer resection and free flap reconstruction.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Secondary care involving multiple centres treating older adult patients for oral cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background:  Multidisciplinary care with vascular surgery and plastic surgery is essential for lower extremity free flap (LEFF) success in the chronic wound population with diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. There is a lack of understanding on performing targeted direct endovascular reperfusion on a vessel that will be used as the flap recipient. Our study compares outcomes of patients who received targeted revascularization (TR) to the recipient vessel for LEFF anastomosis versus nontargeted revascularization (NR) of arterial recipients prior to LEFF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Donor site morbidity of upper extremity flaps in head and neck reconstruction.

Am J Otolaryngol

December 2024

Dr. Elie E. Rebeiz Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address:

Objective: This retrospective cohort study aims to compare donor site morbidity of three commonly used upper extremity flaps used in head and neck reconstructive surgery: scapular tip free flap (STFF), radial forearm free flap (RFFF), and pectoralis major pedicled flap (PMPF).

Methods: The billing database of an urban, academic, tertiary otolaryngology practice was queried to identify patients who underwent STFF, RFFF, and PMPF from 2020 to 2023. The primary outcome was identification of donor site pain and need for physical therapy (PT) referral after undergoing reconstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!