A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Endoscopic prediction of deeply submucosal invasive carcinoma with use of artificial intelligence. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed an AI image classifier's ability to determine if large colonic lesions could be treated with curative endoscopic resection using standard endoscopic images.
  • The AI was trained on 8,000 images and showed an overall accuracy of 85.5%, outperforming junior endoscopists significantly, while showing similar performance to senior endoscopists.
  • Narrow band imaging (NBI) produced higher accuracy rates for the AI classifier compared to white light imaging (WLI), suggesting different imaging techniques can affect diagnostic performance.

Article Abstract

 We evaluated use of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted image classifier in determining the feasibility of curative endoscopic resection of large colonic lesion based on non-magnified endoscopic images  AI image classifier was trained by 8,000 endoscopic images of large (≥ 2 cm) colonic lesions. The independent validation set consisted of 567 endoscopic images from 76 colonic lesions. Histology of the resected specimens was used as gold standard. Curative endoscopic resection was defined as histology no more advanced than well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, ≤ 1 mm submucosal invasion and without lymphovascular invasion, whereas non-curative resection was defined as any lesion that could not meet the above requirements. Performance of the trained AI image classifier was compared with that of endoscopists.  In predicting endoscopic curative resection, AI had an overall accuracy of 85.5 %. Images from narrow band imaging (NBI) had significantly higher accuracy (94.3 % vs 76.0 %;  < 0.00001) and area under the ROC curve (AUROC) (0.934 vs 0.758;  = 0.002) than images from white light imaging (WLI). AI was superior to two junior endoscopists in terms of accuracy (85.5 % vs 61.9 % or 82.0 %,  < 0.05), AUROC (0.837 vs 0.638 or 0.717,  < 0.05) and confidence level (90.1 % vs 83.7 % or 78.3 %,  < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference in accuracy and AUROC between AI and a senior endoscopist.  The trained AI image classifier based on non-magnified images can accurately predict probability of curative resection of large colonic lesions and is better than junior endoscopists. NBI images have better accuracy than WLI for AI prediction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447402PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0849-9548DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image classifier
12
endoscopic images
12
artificial intelligence
8
curative endoscopic
8
endoscopic resection
8
colonic lesions
8
resection defined
8
endoscopic
7
endoscopic prediction
4
prediction deeply
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!