Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Patient Prefer Adherence

Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Medical Affairs, Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA, USA.

Published: April 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • STRs (single-tablet regimens) lead to higher treatment adherence compared to MTRs (multiple-tablet regimens), with a 63% greater likelihood of achieving ≥95% adherence.
  • Higher adherence rates are linked to better viral suppression outcomes, with 13 out of 18 studies showing that increased adherence supports improved viral control.
  • Although the direct impact of STRs on viral suppression is not definitively established, the research highlights a significant correlation between STRs and better adherence levels.

Article Abstract

Background: Antiretroviral therapy (ART), when taken consistently, reduces morbidity and mortality associated with human immunodeficiency virus and viral transmission. Suboptimal treatment adherence is associated with regimen complexity and high tablet burden. Single-tablet regimens (STRs) provide a complete treatment regimen in a single tablet. This study examined the relationship between STRs (vs multiple-tablet regimens [MTRs]), treatment adherence, and viral suppression.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies investigating at least one of the following: (1) STR/MTR use and adherence; (2) levels of adherence and viral suppression; and (3) STR/MTR use and viral suppression. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the relationship between STR vs MTR use and adherence in observational settings at ≥95% and ≥90% adherence thresholds.

Results: In total, 29 studies were identified across the three objectives; two studies were relevant for all objectives. STRs were associated with higher treatment adherence than MTRs in 10/11 observational studies: a 63% greater likelihood of achieving ≥95% adherence (95% CI=1.52-1.74; <0.001) and a 43% increase in the likelihood of achieving ≥90% adherence (95% CI=1.21-1.69; <0.001). Higher adherence rates were associated with higher levels of viral suppression in 13/18 studies. Results were mixed in five studies investigating the association between STR or MTR use and viral suppression.

Conclusion: Although the direct effect of STRs vs MTRs on viral suppression remains unclear, this study provided a quantitative estimate of the relationship between STRs and ART adherence, demonstrating that STRs are associated with significantly higher ART adherence levels at 95% and 90% thresholds. Findings from the systematic review showed that improved adherence results in an increased likelihood of achieving viral suppression in observational settings. Future research should utilize similar measures for adherence and evaluate viral suppression to improve assessment of the relationship between pill burden, adherence, and viral suppression.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6452814PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S192735DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment adherence
12
adherence
9
adherence viral
8
viral suppression
8
treatment
5
adherence hiv
4
hiv treatment
4
treatment regimens
4
regimens systematic
4
systematic literature
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!