Restoration of American chestnut () depends on combining resistance to both the chestnut blight fungus () and , which causes Phytophthora root rot, in a diverse population of . Over a 14-year period (2004 to 2017), survival and root health of American chestnut backcross seedlings after inoculation with were compared among 28 BC, 66 BC, and 389 BCF families that descended from two BC trees (Clapper and Graves) with different Chinese chestnut grandparents. The 5% most resistant Graves BCF families survived infection at rates of 75 to 100% but had mean root health scores that were intermediate between resistant Chinese chestnut and susceptible American chestnut families. Within Graves BCF families, seedling survival was greater than survival of Graves BC and BC families and was not genetically correlated with chestnut blight canker severity. Only low to intermediate resistance to was detected among backcross descendants from the Clapper tree. Results suggest that major-effect resistance alleles were inherited by descendants from the Graves tree, that intercrossing backcross trees enhances progeny resistance to , and that alleles for resistance to and are not linked. To combine resistance to both and , a diverse Graves backcross population will be screened for resistance to , survivors bred with trees selected for resistance to , and progeny selected for resistance to both pathogens will be intercrossed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-18-1976-REDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

american chestnut
16
chinese chestnut
12
bcf families
12
resistance
11
chestnut
9
chestnut backcross
8
chestnut blight
8
root health
8
graves bcf
8
resistance alleles
8

Similar Publications

Asian American Children's Psychological Well-Being and Health Behaviors-Advancing a Culturally Informed Perspective on the Role of Parenting.

JAMA Netw Open

January 2025

Department of Counseling, Developmental, and Educational Psychology, Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Research examining Arab and Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) health disparities faces several research limitations. These obstacles include unrepresentative national data due to the absence of a MENA identifier on the US Census, and a lack of Arab/MENA American participant trust in surveying bodies. This research hesitancy prompts the need for targeted investigation of the barriers preventing Arab/MENA Americans from participating in health research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Heightened anti-Arab/Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) xenophobia in the United States (US) coupled with the addition of a MENA category on the next US Census call into attention the health needs of this minoritized population. Targeted research is needed to better understand the factors that influence Arab/MENA American participation in US-based health research and health care.

Methods: A novel qualitative interview guide was constructed to better understand the health research experiences, health care experiences and needs of Arab/MENA patients nationally.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The text discusses the importance of forecasting future health issues in the USA for effective planning and public awareness regarding disease and injury burdens.
  • It describes the methodology for predicting life expectancy, cause-specific mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) from 2022 to 2050 using the Global Burden of Diseases framework.
  • The forecasting includes various scenarios to assess the potential impacts of health risks and improvements across the country, focusing on demographic trends and health-related risk factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This article describes the development and evaluation of the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Quick Version 4 (GAIN-Q4) for the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) 4th edition patient placement dimension ratings and level of care placement recommendations. The research questions are as follows: (1) Can the GAIN-Q4 replicate recommendations from the prior longer instrument within adolescents and adults? (2) What are the substantive differences in the results by age?

Methods: The 35- to 45-minute GAIN-Q4 was developed through modification of the GAIN-Q3 and evaluated in terms of its ability to predict ASAM dimensional ratings and level of care placement recommendations from the 60- to 120-minute GAIN-I instrument. Data were obtained from participants who are adolescents aged 12 to 17 years (n = 101,897) and adults 18 years and older (n = 204,711) interviewed between 2002 and 2018 across 530 US sites.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!