Objective: To evaluate whether preoperative computed tomography (CT) findings could predict the presence of an impacted stone. Preoperative identification of an impacted ureteral stone may influence patient preparation and operative decisions. Factors predicting ureteral stone impaction have not been clearly identified.
Methods: We identified all patients from June 2014 to July 2016 that underwent ureteroscopic treatment of an impacted ureteral stone. Patients that had ureteral prestenting or previous treatment for their stone were excluded. Noncontrast CT images were reviewed to calculate stone size, stone volume, degree of hydronephrosis (0-3), and Hounsfield units (HU) of the stone as well as the ureter distal and proximal to the stone. These were compared with a control group of patients that had nonimpacted stones.
Results: Patients with impacted stones had a greater stone size, volume, HU of the ureter under the stone, HU under/above ratio, and degree of hydronephrosis on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that HU under the stone was a significant predictor of ureteral stone impaction (odds ratio 1.17; 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.25). Distal ureteral density above 27 HU demonstrated a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 85%, positive predictive value of 89%, and negative predictive value of 81% for ureteral stone impaction.
Conclusion: Impacted stones are associated with ureteral density cut-off value of 27 HU or greater. Measuring this value on preoperative noncontrast CT may help predict which patients are more likely to have impacted stones.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.020 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Comparative study between silodosin, tamsulosin, silodosin plus tadalafil, and tamsulosin plus tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy for lower ureteral stones: a prospective randomized trial.
Int Urol Nephrol
January 2025
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
Purpose: To examine the safety and efficiency of a single-drug therapy with silodosin or tamsulosin versus combined therapy with silodosin plus tadalafil and tamsulosin plus tadalafil as a medical expulsive therapy (MET) for lower ureteral stones.
Methods: This research was a prospective randomized clinical trial carried out at Fayoum University Hospital, Egypt, over one year. Patients with lower ureteral stones (5-10 mm) were randomly allocated into one of four treatment groups.
Impact of preoperative stenting in management of bilateral ureteral stones.
Int Urol Nephrol
January 2025
Department of Urology, Istanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact of preoperative stenting on surgical outcomes and complications in patients with bilateral ureteric stones, specifically assessing its role in reducing the need for subsequent interventions.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary center over eight years, involving 82 patients with bilateral ureteric stones. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (no preoperative stenting) and Group 2 (preoperative stenting).
The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy for large volume stones and hazards of ureteral access sheath usage: A prospective randomized study.
Arab J Urol
September 2024
Department of Urology, Kasr Alainy Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Objectives: We aimed to assess the stone free rate of flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (FURL) in upper urinary tract stones (UUTS) >20 mm and the risk of complications from ureteral access sheath (UAS) usage.
Methods: This is a prospective randomized clinical trial that included patients with UUTS larger than 20 mm who underwent FURL after randomization into two groups: group A (UAS) and group B (non-UAS). Data were collected for patients' demographics, stone parameters, operative and postoperative complications, and the outcome of FURL regarding stone-free rate (SFR) and perioperative complications, with a 6-month follow-up.
The assistive role of an internal fluid circulatory device in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a randomized, controlled and prospective study.
Int Urol Nephrol
January 2025
Department of Urology, People's Hospital of Yangjiang (Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Yangjiang), Yangjiang, 529500, China.
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of a newly designed in-house assistive internal fluid circulatory device in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones.
Methods: In this study, 97 patients were assigned to the trial group and underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy with an in-house newly designed assistive internal fluid circulatory device; 96 patients were assigned to the control group and underwent traditional ureteroscopic lithotripsy without the assistive device. The primary outcome was the final stone-free rate (SFR) at 1-month post-surgery.
Robot-Assisted Pyelolithotomy in Pelvic Kidney.
J Clin Med
December 2024
Department of Urology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan 5262000, Israel.
Pelvic kidney is a congenital anomaly characterized by the kidney's failure to ascend to its normal anatomical location during early embryonic development. This anomaly complicates traditional surgical approaches for renal calculi due to the kidney's atypical positioning and associated anatomical challenges. We sought to summarize our experience with robotic-assisted pyelolithotomy (RPPK) for pelvic kidney stones.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!