Differentiating focal autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: contrast-enhanced MRI with special emphasis on the arterial phase.

Eur Radiol

Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.

Published: November 2019

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Objectives: To compare focal-type autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) using contrast-enhanced MR imaging (CE-MRI), and to assess diagnostic performance of the lesion contrast at arterial phase (AP) (Contrast) for differentiating between the two diseases.

Methods: Thirty-six patients with focal-type AIP and 72 patients with PDA were included. All included patients underwent CE-MRI with triple phases. The signal intensity (SI) of the mass and normal pancreas was measured at each phase, and the lesion contrast (SI/SI) was compared between AIP and PDA groups. The sensitivity and specificity of Contrast using an optimal cutoff point were compared with those of key imaging features specific to AIP and PDA.

Results: The lesion contrast differed significantly between AIP and PDA groups at all phases of CE-MRI; the maximum difference was observed at AP. For AIP, the sensitivity (94.4%) and specificity (87.5%) of Contrast (cutoff ≤ 1.41) were comparable or significantly higher than those of all key imaging features (sensitivity, 38.9-88.9%; specificity, 48.6-95.8%), except for the halo sign. For PDA, the sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (94.4%) of Contrast (cutoff > 1.41) were comparable or significantly higher than those of all key imaging features (sensitivity, 40.3-68.1%; specificity, 72.2-94.4%), except for the discrete mass.

Conclusions: Quantitative analysis of the lesion contrast using CE-MRI, particularly at AP, was helpful to differentiate focal-type AIP from PDA. The diagnostic performance of Contrast was mostly comparable or higher than those of the key imaging features.

Key Points: • Diagnosis of focal-type AIP vs. PDA using imaging techniques is extremely challenging. • Lesion contrast in the arterial-phase MRI differs significantly between focal-type AIP and PDA. • Quantitative analysis of lesion contrast using CE-MRI, particularly at the arterial phase, is helpful to differentiate focal-type AIP from PDA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06200-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lesion contrast
24
aip pda
24
focal-type aip
20
key imaging
16
arterial phase
12
imaging features
12
comparable higher
12
higher key
12
contrast
11
aip
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!