Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and lithium disilicate are widely used materials in the dental field. PMMA is mainly used for the manufacture of removable prostheses; however, with the incorporation of CAD-CAM technology, new applications have been introduced for this material, including as a provisional implant attachment. Lithium disilicate is considered the gold standard for definitive attachment material. On the other hand, PMMA has begun to be used in clinics as a provisional attachment until the placement of a definitive one occurs. Although there are clinical studies regarding its use, there are few studies on cell reorganization around this type of material. This is why we carried out an comparative study using discs of both materials in which human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) were cultured. After processing them, we analyzed various cellular parameters (cell count, cytoskeleton length, core size and coverage area). We analyzed the surface of the discs together with their composition. The results obtained were mostly not statistically significant, which shows that the qualities of PMMA make it a suitable material as an implant attachment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6523339PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11040744DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lithium disilicate
12
comparative study
8
pmma lithium
8
implant attachment
8
pmma
5
study fibroblastic
4
fibroblastic behaviour
4
behaviour polymethacrylate
4
polymethacrylate pmma
4
disilicate polymer
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!