AI Article Synopsis

  • A study in southeast Botswana found high Anaplasma infection rates in both beef (91%) and dairy (31%) cattle using two testing methods: cELISA and PCR.
  • There was a significant difference in prevalence between beef and dairy cattle as determined by the PCR method, with beef cattle showing nearly double the infection rate.
  • Overall, Anaplasma infections were widespread and endemic in the region, suggesting the need for more research to identify the specific strains infecting cattle herds.

Article Abstract

Infection of cattle by the tick-borne intra-erythrocytic bacteria of the genus Anaplasma occurs worldwide. Nevertheless, prevalence rates in specific regions are still required to inform cattle farming management decisions. A study was carried out to determine Anaplasma infection prevalence in beef and dairy cattle in the south east region of Botswana. Two methods were used: competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assay (cELISA) and conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A total of 429 cattle consisting 207 beef and 222 dairy animals were sampled and tested. The prevalence was 91% and 31% by cELISA and PCR, respectively. A Z test revealed a statistical difference between the point prevalence as determined by cELISA compared to PCR (p=0). There was no statistical difference between the point prevalence of Anaplasma infection as determined by cELISA (p=0.45) between beef and dairy cattle. But there was a significant difference (p=0.001) between the animals by PCR with the prevalence in beef cattle nearly double that in dairy cattle. Individual herd prevalence ranged from 79% to 100% by cELISA, and 0 to 100% by PCR. Though not statistically significant sero-prevalence in both beef and dairy animals tended to be higher in urban/peri-urban areas compared to rural areas. The cELISA mean percentage inhibition (PI) for all cattle was found to be 58.6 (95% CI: 56.8-60.4). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean PI of sera from beef cattle (56.4 (95% CI: 54.1-58.7)) as compared to dairy cattle (60.7 (95%CI: 58.0-63.3)). However, there was a tendency towards statistical significance with beef animals having a lower PI value than dairy animals. Anaplasma infection was endemic in cattle in the south east region of Botswana with similar infection in beef and dairy animals. Further research should be done to identify the strains prevalent in the cattle herds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.12.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

beef dairy
20
dairy cattle
20
anaplasma infection
16
dairy animals
16
cattle
13
prevalence beef
12
cattle south
12
south east
12
east region
12
region botswana
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!