A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Natural resolution of non-anaphylactic shrimp allergy in patients diagnosed 10 years earlier by oral food challenge. | LitMetric

Natural resolution of non-anaphylactic shrimp allergy in patients diagnosed 10 years earlier by oral food challenge.

Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol

Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Published: December 2021

Background: Shrimp allergy is considered a lifelong condition. The natural resolution of shrimp allergy is not well studied.

Objective: To investigate the natural resolution of shrimp allergy among a cohort of patients diagnosed with shrimp allergy 10 years earlier by oral shrimp challenge.

Methods: A prospective study recruited patients diagnosed with shrimp allergy to Penaeus monodon (Pm), Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Mr), or both from a study conducted during 2005-2006. The current oral shrimp challenges were conducted during 2015-2016. The negative oral shrimp challenge was designated 'resolved shrimp allergy' (RSA), with a positive challenge designated 'persistent shrimp allergy' (PSA). Skin prick and prick-to-prick testing to shrimp were used to determine sensitization.

Results: Sixty patients who had positive shrimp challenge from the previous cohort were contacted. Patients who had previous anaphylactic reaction (8 subjects) or allergic reaction after shrimp ingestion within 6 months (6 subjects), were not included. Nine patients refused to participate and 20 patients could not be contacted. Seventeen patients were included. Three were previously diagnosed with allergy to Pm, 3 to Mr, and 11 to both species. RSA was observed in 1 patient with isolated Pm allergy, and in 3 patients with isolated Mr allergy. Three of 9 patients with dual allergy had RSA to both species. RSA patients had significantly smaller size of shrimp skin test than PSA patients at both diagnosis and follow-up.

Conclusions: At ten years after diagnosis, 46% of patients had RSA. These patients had significantly smaller size of shrimp skin test than PSA patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.12932/AP-080119-0470DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

shrimp allergy
24
shrimp
16
patients
15
natural resolution
12
patients diagnosed
12
oral shrimp
12
allergy
10
allergy patients
8
years earlier
8
earlier oral
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!