A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3145
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Using contingent valuation to develop consumer-based weights for health quality report cards. | LitMetric

Using contingent valuation to develop consumer-based weights for health quality report cards.

Health Serv Res

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, iTEQC Research Program, University of California, Irvine, California.

Published: August 2019

Objective: The current 5-Star composite measure for nursing homes uses expert-driven weights to combine elements of quality into a single score. We assessed the feasibility of using the contingent valuation method (CVM) to derive consumers' preference-based weights for the Nursing Home Compare report card as a potential alternative approach.

Data Sources: Survey of 4310 adults with nursing home experience (residents or family members of a resident) administered between September 25 and October 9, 2017.

Study Design: Contingent valuation method based on respondents' answers to questions about willingness-to-trade (WTT) visit travel time for better quality in seven quantitative indices included in Nursing Home Compare. We calculated WTT amounts per standard deviation change in quantitative indices to derive weights.

Data Collection Methods: Web-based survey.

Principal Findings: Contingent valuation method results are consistent with respondents making economically rational trade-offs between quality and travel time. Estimates of mean WTT vary across quantitative quality indices. They also vary in terms of respondent status and behavioral factors. Weights based on mean WTT per standard deviation vary substantially across indices, with the largest weights for inspections and staffing.

Conclusions: Contingent valuation method has promise as a method for deriving weights for use in summary measures that incorporate consumer preferences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6606546PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13155DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

contingent valuation
20
valuation method
16
nursing compare
8
travel time
8
quantitative indices
8
standard deviation
8
weights
6
contingent
5
quality
5
method
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!