Multistage collaborative exams are implemented to enhance learning and retention of course material. However, the effects of multistage collaborative exams on retention of course content are varied. These discrepancies may be due to a number of factors. To date, studies examining collaborative exams and content retention have used questions that all, or mostly, require students to select an answer, rather than generate one of their own. However, content retention can improve when students generate their own responses. Thus, we examined the effect of collaborative exams with open-ended questions on retention of course content. Retention was measured at two time periods; one relatively shortly (9 days) following a collaborative exam and another over a longer time period (23 days). Furthermore, we examined whether content retention differed for low-, mid-, or high--performing students. Our results suggest that collaborative exams offer retention benefits at relatively long time periods between pre- and posttests, but not over shorter time periods. Retention varied across students in different performance categories. Our study, the first to use only open-ended questions, showed relatively small effects compared with studies using multiple-choice or fill-in-the-blank format, but still suggest that collaborative exams can aid in content retention.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6755206 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0137 | DOI Listing |
BMC Med Educ
January 2025
The First Clinical Medicine School of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Objective: This study examines a novel teaching model that integrates the development and use of a Medical Cloud Dictionary with project-based learning (PBL). We investigate whether this integrated approach improves teaching effectiveness, enhances student learning outcomes, and reduces teaching pressure compared to traditional PBL.
Methods: One hundred student volunteers were randomly assigned to an experimental group (n = 50) and a control group (n = 50).
BMC Med Educ
January 2025
Department of Health Services, Policy, and Management, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, 915 Greene Street, Discovery Bldg. Suite 349, Columbia, 378, South Carolina, USA.
Background: Health literacy (HL) is crucial for making informed health decisions. Over one-third of US adults have limited HL, leading to adverse health outcomes. Despite its importance, HL education lacks standardization in medical training.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Sci Educ
December 2024
UCL Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
University College London (UCL) and Newgiza University (NGU) have been in an academic collaboration since 2016. We describe the introduction of a real-time feedback model for OSCE assessments within this partnership. We developed a workshop for faculty members at UCL and NGU to co-develop OSCE stations for use in final year summative exams at NGU.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNPJ Digit Med
January 2025
Hopkins Business of Health Initiative, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) for pediatric diabetic retinal disease (DRD) screening has demonstrated safety, effectiveness, and the potential to enhance health equity and clinician productivity. We examined the cost-effectiveness of an autonomous AI strategy versus a traditional eye care provider (ECP) strategy during the initial year of implementation from a health system perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the main outcome measure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Med Educ
December 2024
Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Heinrich Heine University and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany.
Background: Prior studies found that dental students are affected by various stressors during their studies. Those stressors can exert adverse effects on their (mental) health. Our study addresses the lack of qualitative data on students' perspectives by exploring perceived stressors and resources among dental students and interventions suggested by them.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!