A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A systematic narrative synthesis of acute amplification-induced improvements in cognitive ability in hearing-impaired adults. | LitMetric

A systematic narrative synthesis of acute amplification-induced improvements in cognitive ability in hearing-impaired adults.

Int J Audiol

b Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness , School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester , UK.

Published: August 2019

This systematic review investigated if hearing aid use was associated with acute improvements in cognitive function in hearing-impaired adults. The review question and inclusion/exclusion criteria were designed using the Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) mnemonic. The review was pre-registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) and performed in accordance with the statement on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Thirteen articles, of various designs, published between 1990 and 2018, were identified a search of five electronic databases. Most studies reported 1-2 cognitive outcome measures. Nine studies reported a significant improvement in outcome and four studies reported no significant change. None of the 13 studies received a high score on a quality assessment checklist. Due to concerns over risk of bias and indirectness, the overall quality of evidence was graded as low. Only a few studies were identified, some of which report a small improvement in cognitive outcome; however, the overall quality of evidence was low. Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in answering the review question.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2019.1594414DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

studies reported
12
improvements cognitive
8
hearing-impaired adults
8
systematic review
8
review question
8
cognitive outcome
8
quality evidence
8
review
5
studies
5
systematic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!