Discounting health and money: New evidence using a more robust method.

J Risk Uncertain

5IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Aix-Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France.

Published: May 2018

This study compares discounting for money and health in a field study. We applied the direct method, which measures discounting independent of utility, in a representative French sample, interviewed at home by professional interviewers. We found more discounting for money than for health. The median discount rates (6.5% for money and 2.2% for health) were close to market interest rates, suggesting that at the aggregate level the direct method solves the puzzle of unrealistically high discount rates typically observed in applied economics. Constant discounting fitted the data better than the hyperbolic discounting models that we considered. The substantial individual heterogeneity in discounting was correlated with age and occupation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445504PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11166-018-9279-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

discounting money
8
money health
8
direct method
8
discount rates
8
discounting
7
discounting health
4
money
4
health money
4
money evidence
4
evidence robust
4

Similar Publications

Aims: Empagliflozin confers cardioprotective benefits among patients with heart failure, across the range of ejection fraction (EF), regardless of type 2 diabetes status. The long-term cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin for the treatment of heart failure (HF) in the Philippines remains unclear. This study aims to determine the economic benefit of adding empagliflozin to the standard of care (SoC) vs the SoC alone for HF in the Philippines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Whether temporal discounting is domain-specific between health outcomes and money: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Clin Pharm

December 2024

School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, No. 639 Longmian Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211198, Jiangsu, China.

Background: Temporal discounting, the preference for immediate over delayed rewards, affects decision-making in domains like health and finance. Understanding the differences in how people discount health outcomes compared to monetary rewards is crucial to shaping health policy and technology assessments.

Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare temporal discounting parameters between health outcomes and monetary rewards and evaluate their overall relationship.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of percutaneous repair (PR) for secondary mitral regurgitation.

Design: An economic evaluation using a time-varying Markov model comprising three states to assess the cost and effectiveness of PR added to guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) compared with GDMT alone. Clinical outcomes considered within the model were overall survival and heart failure (HF) hospitalisations (HFH), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cost-Effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: A Real-World, 2-Year Prospective Study.

Diabetes Care

November 2024

Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Objective: We evaluated the real-world cost-effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) for people with prediabetes in a large workforce with employer-sponsored health insurance.

Research Design And Methods: We performed difference-in-differences analyses using individual-level health insurance claims and survey data for 5,948 adults with prediabetes who enrolled (n = 575) or did not enroll (n = 5,373) in the NDPP to assess NDPP's effects on health economic outcomes. We assessed direct medical costs for the year before the NDPP enrollment/index date and for 2 years thereafter; EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) utility scores at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years; and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 2 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Public budgets are limited and priorities must be made between competing projects. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is the standard tool to assess projects and prioritise between them, as is done, e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!