Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To evaluate the benefit of adding occupational therapy or physiotherapy interventions to a standard rehabilitation programme targeted for chronic widespread pain.
Design: Randomized active-controlled non-blinded trial.
Subjects: Women with chronic widespread pain recruited in a tertiary outpatient clinic.
Methods: Participants were randomized to a two-week, group-based standard rehabilitation programme followed by 16 weeks of group-based occupational therapy (Group B, = 43) or 16 weeks of group-based physiotherapy (Group B, = 42). Group A only received the two-week rehabilitation programme acting as comparator ( = 96).
Outcomes: Primary outcomes were the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills and Short Form-36 (SF36) Mental Component Summary score.
Results: Mean changes in motor and process ability measures were clinically and statistically insignificant and without differences across the three groups assessed 88 weeks from baseline. Motor ability measures: -0.006 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.244 to 0.233) in Group B; -0.045 (95% CI: -0.291 to 0.202) in Group B; and -0.017 (95% CI: -0.248 to 0.213) in Group A, = 0.903. Process ability measures: 0.087 (95% CI: -0.056 to 0.231) in Group B; 0.075 (95% CI: -0.075 to 0.226) in Group B; and 0.072 (95% CI: -0.067 to 0.211) in Group A, = 0.924. Mean changes in patient-reported outcomes were likewise small; clinically and statistically insignificant; and independent of group allocation, except for the SF36 mental component summary score in the B group: 8.58 (95% CI: 1.75 to 15.41).
Conclusion: Participants were on average stable in observation-based measures of functional ability and patient-reported outcomes, except in overall mental well-being, favouring the enhanced intervention. Efficacy of additional interventions on functional ability remains uncertain.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215519843986 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!