FIGO Stage Is the Strongest Prognostic Factor in Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB; Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, AB.

Published: September 2019

Objective: This study aimed to identify clinical and pathological determinants of invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix (AC) in a large, single-centre series serving a population of 1.5 million.

Methods: Data on clinical (n = 27) and pathological (n = 23) variables for 166 women with a diagnosis of AC treated between 2000 and 2013 were extracted from their charts and pathology reports. Overall survival (OS) was calculated, and significant determinants were identified using Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests, respectively (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2).

Results: This was a heterogeneous group of women with all stages of disease treated with conization, surgery, radiation, and systemic chemotherapy, alone or in combination. Mean age at diagnosis was 43; 86.7% had stage I disease, 9.6% had stage II, and only 3.6% had stage III and IV disease. Mean follow-up was 108 months. Many histotypes were diagnosed and grouped as mucinous (n = 103), endometrioid (n = 15), rare (n = 9), and adenosquamous (n = 39) types. Twenty-eight women had recurrent cancer and died of the disease; OS at 5 years was 85%. Five-year OS for women with stage I was 92%, compared with 40% for stage II or higher. Univariate analysis revealed that premenopausal status, tumour size, first-line treatment with chemotherapy, lymphovascular invasion, rare histological subtypes, stage, and receipt of second-line treatment were all significantly associated with a lower OS. Using multivariate analysis, only stage remained an independent factor.

Conclusion: This is the largest single-centre Canadian series of invasive AC. Stage is the strongest prognostic factor in multivariate analysis; in contrast to other studies, lymph node status was not a significant determinant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2019.01.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stage strongest
8
strongest prognostic
8
prognostic factor
8
adenocarcinoma uterine
8
uterine cervix
8
stage
8
multivariate analysis
8
figo stage
4
factor adenocarcinoma
4
cervix objective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!