Adherence to optical safety guidelines for laser-assisted hair removal.

Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed

Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Published: September 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • Recent years have seen an increase in eye injuries linked to cosmetic laser hair removal procedures.
  • A study was conducted across 31 private clinics to evaluate compliance with optical safety guidelines during treatment, using surveys and observations.
  • Results showed that only 9.5% of providers adhered to safety guidelines, highlighting serious deficiencies that could lead to severe eye injuries; no providers reached excellent compliance.

Article Abstract

Background: In recent years, there was a rise in ocular injuries secondary to cosmetic laser-assisted hair removal.

Purpose: To assess the level of adherence to optical safety guidelines during laser-assisted hair removal performed by nurses or physicians in private practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at thirty-one private laser-assisted hair removal clinics. An electronic random number generator using a cluster random sampling technique was used to select the clinics. The Alexlazr™ (Candela Corp.) device operator's manual checklist was modified to collect data from laser device operators and patients by surveying the laser rooms, interviewing the patients, and observing the treatments.

Results: Ninety-four patients treated by different service providers were included from 31 private centers. All treatment sessions were delivered by trained nurses. Only 9.5% had acceptable adherence to optical safety guidelines during hair removal treatment, while the majority (90.5%) of service providers were poorly adherent. None of the providers achieved excellent adherence to optical safety guidelines. The item with the least adherence was the lack of non-reflective floors inside laser rooms in 72.3% of centers. All service providers were familiar with the laser system controls and emergency shutdown (100% adherence).

Conclusion: There is a significant deficiency in the safety precautions at laser-assisted hair removal centers that can result in devastating ophthalmic injuries. Companies providing laser-assisted hair removal machines should be involved in aiding these centers to implement safety procedures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12473DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laser-assisted hair
24
hair removal
24
adherence optical
16
optical safety
16
safety guidelines
16
service providers
12
guidelines laser-assisted
8
laser rooms
8
hair
7
safety
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!