Introduction: Optimal pain management is crucial to the postoperative recovery process. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous oxycodone with intravenous fentanyl, morphine, sufentanil, pethidine, and hydromorphone for acute postoperative pain.

Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases was performed for randomized controlled trials published from 2008 through 2017 (inclusive) that evaluated the acute postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous oxycodone against fentanyl, morphine, sufentanil, pethidine, and hydromorphone in adult patients (age ≥ 18 years). Outcomes examined included analgesic consumption, pain intensity levels, side effects, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Eleven studies were included in the review; six compared oxycodone with fentanyl, two compared oxycodone with morphine, and three compared oxycodone with sufentanil. There were no eligible studies comparing oxycodone with pethidine or hydromorphone. Overall, analgesic consumption was lower with oxycodone than with fentanyl or sufentanil. Oxycodone exhibited better analgesic efficacy than fentanyl and sufentanil, and comparable analgesic efficacy to morphine. In terms of safety, there was a tendency towards more side effects with oxycodone than with fentanyl, but the incidence of side effects with oxycodone was comparable to morphine and sufentanil. Where patient satisfaction was evaluated, higher satisfaction levels were observed with oxycodone than with sufentanil and comparable satisfaction was noted when comparing oxycodone with fentanyl. Patient satisfaction was not evaluated in the studies comparing oxycodone with morphine.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that intravenous oxycodone provides better analgesic efficacy than fentanyl and sufentanil, and comparable efficacy to morphine with less adverse events such as sedation. No studies comparing intravenous oxycodone with pethidine or hydromorphone were identified in this review. Better alignment of study methodologies for future research in this area is recommended to provide the best evidence base for a meta-analysis.

Funding: Mundipharma Singapore Holding Pte Ltd, Singapore.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6514019PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-019-0122-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intravenous oxycodone
20
oxycodone fentanyl
20
pethidine hydromorphone
16
analgesic efficacy
16
oxycodone
15
acute postoperative
12
morphine sufentanil
12
side effects
12
compared oxycodone
12
studies comparing
12

Similar Publications

Background: Oxycodone, a widely used opioid analgesic, has an unbound brain-to-plasma concentration ratio (K) greater than unity, indicating active uptake across brain barriers associated with the putative proton-coupled organic cation (H/OC) antiporter system. With this study, we aimed to elucidate oxycodone's CNS disposition during lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced systemic inflammation in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Methods: Using brain microdialysis, we dynamically and simultaneously monitored unbound oxycodone concentrations in blood, striatum, lateral ventricle, and cisterna magna following intravenous administration of oxycodone post-LPS challenge.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A clinical study was conducted to assess different pain management strategies after cesarean sections (CS) using 300 participants divided into five groups based on their anesthesia methods and analgesic protocols.
  • Results indicated that the group receiving intrathecal morphine (ITM) reported the best pain relief and function, followed closely by the group combining spinal anesthesia with fentanyl and a TAP block (ITF+TAP).
  • The general anesthesia group experienced the worst pain and had the quickest request for additional analgesia, highlighting the effectiveness of multimodal analgesia in enhancing postoperative recovery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Morphine is effective in palliative care for patients with end-stage heart failure; however, its use is avoided in patients with impaired renal function because it tends to induce adverse effects. Although oxycodone has been reported to be a useful alternative, the evidence is insufficient. Therefore, we investigated the safety and efficacy of oxycodone in eight patients with end-stage heart failure complicated by chronic kidney disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rationale: G-protein biased mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists have been reported to exhibit superior therapeutic windows compared to prototypical MOR agonists when relating antinociception to respiratory depression. However, there is relatively little research on the abuse potential of G-protein biased MOR agonists in relation to other behavioral endpoints.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to quantitatively compare the reinforcing, antinociceptive, and respiratory-depressant effects of the prototypical MOR agonists, fentanyl and oxycodone, to the G-protein biased MOR agonists, SR14968 and SR17018, in male and female rats.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This guideline establishes clinical practice recommendations for Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) and Periodic Limb Movement Disorder (PLMD) in adults and pediatric patients.

Methods: The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine to develop recommendations and assign strengths based on a systematic review of the literature and an assessment of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The task force provided a summary of the relevant literature and the certainty of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations that support the recommendations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!