Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The optimal sternal closure technique in patients at elevated risk after cardiac surgery has not been elucidated.
Methods: Between January 2006 and July 2015, 15,048 consecutive adult patients underwent cardiac surgery via median sternotomy using cardiopulmonary bypass. Rigid sternal fixation using 3 separate techniques (peristernal polyether ether-ketone banding, titanium plating, and stainless steel multibraided cables with cannulated screws) was used in 1111 patients (group A), whereas conventional peristernal/transsternal wiring was used in 13,937 patients (group B). Predictors of deep sternal wound infection or dehiscence were evaluated, and propensity score analysis was used to create 2 matched groups; 1050 group A patients (94.5%) were matched to group B patients.
Results: Mean time to presentation was 31 ± 70.3 days (median, 19) after surgery. There was a decreased incidence of deep sternal wound infection or dehiscence among propensity score-matched group A compared with group B patients (1.9% vs 2.7%, P = .13), although it was not statistically significant. On multivariate analysis, group A was associated with a 33% relative risk reduction of deep sternal wound infection or dehiscence (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.94; P = .02); this was entirely due to a protective effect associated with polyether ether-ketone banding (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.7; P = .0002). In the subgroup of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting patients (n = 886), there was a strong protective trend associated with preventative sternal fixation, although it was not statistically significant (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-1.09; P = .06).
Conclusions: Primary sternal fixation in patients at risk of sternal complications is associated with decreased sternal infection and/or dehiscence. Primary fixation may expand the use of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting to patient populations at increased risk for sternal complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.046 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!