Does the implicit outcomes expectancies shape learning and memory processes?

Cognition

Department of Psychology, Universidad de Almería, Spain; CERNEP Research Center, Universidad de Almería, Spain. Electronic address:

Published: August 2019

Does the explicit or implicit knowledge about the consequences of our choices shape learning and memory processes? This seems to be the case according to previous studies demonstrating improvements in learning and retention of symbolic relations and in visuospatial recognition memory when each correct choice is reinforced with its own unique and explicit outcome (the differential outcomes procedure, DOP). In the present study, we aim to extend these findings by exploring the impact of the DOP under conditions of non-conscious processing. To test for this, both the outcomes (Experiment 1A) and the sample stimuli (Experiment 1B) were presented under subliminal (non-conscious) and supraliminal conditions in a delayed visual recognition memory task. Results from both experiments showed a better visual recognition memory when participants were trained with the DOP regardless the awareness of the outcomes or even of the stimuli used for training. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that the DOP can be effective under unconscious conditions. This finding is discussed in the light of the two-memory systems model developed by Savage and colleagues to explain the beneficial effects observed on learning and memory when differential outcomes are applied.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

learning memory
12
recognition memory
12
shape learning
8
memory processes?
8
differential outcomes
8
visual recognition
8
memory
6
implicit outcomes
4
outcomes expectancies
4
expectancies shape
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!