Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
There are potential pitfalls associated with the pursuit of accurate surgical navigation, such as vulnerability of the reference array to accidental dislodgment and damage or soiling of tracking arrays on tools. Additionally, there are hazards encountered when attempting accurate robotic screw placement in spine surgery, including skiving of the tool on bone, displacement of the robotic arm, or patient movement. Proven techniques are needed to address and mitigate these issues to ensure that navigation integrity is maintained and screw placement is accurate when using navigated robotic surgical guidance systems. The following research describes some potential hazards commonly encountered in robotic navigated screw placement, suggests techniques for overcoming these hazards, and provides examples of how these techniques have been incorporated into existing surgical robotic guidance systems.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00963-w | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!