Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Vitamin D has been considered to regulate calcium and phosphorus homeostasis and to preserve skeletal integrity. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) is the best indicator of vitamin D levels. The association of serum 25(OH)D deficiency with increased risk of type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is controversial. We investigated serum 25(OH)D and 25(OH)D levels in diabetes patients by using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Serum 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 levels were measured with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in electrospray ionization positive mode. Chromatograms were separated using an ACE5 C18 column on a gradient of methanol. The total 25(OH)D levels were calculated as the sum of 25(OH)D3 and 25(OH)D2 levels. A total of 56 patients with T1DM and 41 patients with T2DM were enrolled in this study. There were 42 and 28 non-diabetic, age-matched volunteers who participated as the T1DM controls and the T2DM controls, respectively. The total 25(OH)D levels were lowest in the 21-40 age group. The levels of both 25(OH)D3 and the total 25(OH)D were significantly higher in the T1DM and T2DM groups than in the controls (p < 0.01 in T1DM and p < 0.05 in T2DM group, respectively). The 25(OH)D2 levels were only significantly higher in T1DM patients than in the controls. The percentages of vitamin D deficiency (total 25(OH)D less than 20 ng/mL) in the T1DM, T2DM, the T1DM controls and the T2DM controls were 7.1%, 0%, 14.3% and 3.6%, respectively. The percentages of vitamin D insufficiency (total 25(OH)D less than 30 ng/mL) in the T1DM, T2DM, the T1DM controls and the T2DM controls were 26.8%, 7.3%, 54.8% and 17.9%, respectively. The percentages of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency were significantly lower in the T1DM patients than in the T1DM controls (p < 0.01). In the present study, both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients had higher serum 25(OH)D levels and lower percentages of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9296195 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2018.12.004 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!