AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines why female students are less likely to take advanced physics courses compared to male students, using an online homework intervention with different context options to boost interest and performance.
  • It finds that females preferred biology contexts for physics problems, while males favored traditional contexts, and that both genders were motivated by interest and perceived difficulty, though rationales were similar.
  • Results showed that while males initially outperformed females on assessments, the intervention helped females significantly improve their scores, reducing the gender gap, especially as they also began choosing traditional contexts more.

Article Abstract

Throughout the world, female students are less likely than males to take advanced physics courses. This mixed-methods study uses a concurrent, nested design to study an online homework intervention designed to address choice and achievement. A choice of three different contexts (biological, sports, and traditional) were offered to students for each physics problem, intending to stimulate females' interest and enhance achievement. Informed by aspects of Artino's social-cognitive model of academic motivation and emotion, we investigated: Which context of physics problems do males and females select?; What explanations do students give for their choices?; Are there differences in the achievement of males and females?; and Is there a relationship between student achievement and the context selected? Fifty-two high school physics students from five US states participated. Data included pre- and post-Force Concept Inventory scores, homework context choices and achievement, and rationales for choices. Findings indicate that females were most likely to select biology contexts; males, traditional. All students made more attempts on video questions over word questions, although females did not score as well. For all questions, students generally persisted until they answered them correctly, with females taking fewer attempts on problems. Context choice was mostly driven by interest, for males, and perceptions of difficulty level for females; however, rationales were indistinguishable by gender. On their first homework question attempt, females scored significantly better than the males. Initially, males had significantly higher FCI scores; post homework intervention, females increased their mean scores significantly on the FCI, erasing the initial gender gap, with no growth nor decline in males' scores. Females with FCI growth were equally as likely to choose biology contexts as traditional contexts; males were more likely to choose biology contexts. Findings from this study suggest that modest changes to homework problems that provide choice and make the physics problems more contextually interesting-even without changes in classroom instruction-could increase interest and motivation in students and increase achievement for both male and female students. Recommendations will be discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449438PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00594DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

physics problems
12
biology contexts
12
gender gap
8
students
8
female students
8
males
8
homework intervention
8
females
8
contexts males
8
choose biology
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!