A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Use of a magnetic double J stent in pediatric patients: A case-control study at two Canadian pediatric centers. | LitMetric

Background: Ureteral stents with magnetic tips (Blackstar©) were recently approved for use in Canada. To our knowledge this is the first published evidence of their use in pediatric patients. Traditionally, pediatric stent insertion and removal are performed under general anesthetic. Magnetic stents have three main benefits in pediatric patients; cost savings, decreased OR time and reduced general anesthetic exposure.

Methods: This study was a proof of concept pilot, ran from May 2017-May 2018 to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of magnetic stents in pediatric patients. Patients undergoing ureteroscopy, ureteric re-implantation, and pyeloplasty with simultaneous magnetic stent insertion. Forty (40) patients had regular double J stents removed under anesthesia and served as control cases, and 40 patients had a magnetic double J at initial surgery at two different sites, CHU de Quebec and Alberta Children's Hospital.

Results: Overall, 39 magnetic stents were successfully retrieved without general anesthetic, representing a retrieval failure rate of only 2.5%.

Conclusion: As demonstrated in our research, magnetic stents represent a safe and equally effective alternative to traditional stents, especially in a pediatric patient. This is because, at worst, if retrieval of the magnetic stent fails, traditional cystoscopic removal can be performed, so nothing is lost.

Study Type: Case-control study.

Level Of Evidence: Level III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.03.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pediatric patients
16
magnetic stents
16
general anesthetic
12
magnetic
9
magnetic double
8
stent insertion
8
removal performed
8
stents pediatric
8
magnetic stent
8
pediatric
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!