A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The association of home and accurately measured office blood pressure with coronary artery calcification among general Japanese men. | LitMetric

Objective: We conducted a cross-sectional study to clarify whether home blood pressure (HBP) is more strongly associated with coronary artery calcification (CAC) than accurately measured office blood pressure (OBP) among the general population of Japanese men.

Methods: We analyzed the data of 919 Japanese male participants who were randomly selected from general population (mean age 64.5 years). OBP was measured twice consecutively by a trained nurse using electrical device after 5 min of complete rest alone in a sitting position in a silent room. The participants were asked to measure HBP with an electrical device once in the morning during 7 consecutive days. CAC was assessed using computed tomography. Presence of CAC was defined as Agatston score at least 10. We calculated odds ratios for the presence of CAC per one SD higher OBP and HBP adjusted for age and other cardiovascular risk factors.

Results: The mean systolic OBP (SD) and HBP (SD) were 136.8 (19.0) and 137.2 (18.5) mmHg, respectively, without statistical difference between the two (P = 0.595). OBP and HBP were highly correlated (r = 0.74 P < 0.001). CAC was found in 454 (49.4%) participants. Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence interval (CI)] for the presence of CAC were comparable between OBP (1.32, 95% CI: 1.12-1.56) and HBP (1.35, 95% CI: 1.14-1.60) (P heterogeneity = 0.813).

Conclusion: The strength of association of accurately measured OBP with CAC was comparable with that of HBP among randomly selected male general population aged 40-79 years.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002080DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood pressure
12
obp hbp
12
accurately measured
8
measured office
8
office blood
8
coronary artery
8
artery calcification
8
general population
8
electrical device
8
presence cac
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!