Background: The Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSS) is the most widely used instrument to measure this trait. Although the test offers results by levels (low, medium & high), the mean of global scores it is the indicator mostly used in scientific studies. The purpose of this study is to compare self-esteem levels with the global scores as criteria for contrasting self-esteem in subjects with and without a History of Childhood Sexual Abuse (HCSA).

Method: RSS was administered to 74 subjects between 17 and 60 years, half of them with a HCSA, 20 men and 54 women; subjects without a HCSA were used as a comparison group.

Results: Using the mean of the global scores as a criterion to compare the two groups, no significant differences were observed. However, when using self-esteem levels as a criterion, the findings indicate significant differences between subjects with and without HCSA.

Conclusions: The study shows that self-esteem levels are more accurate than global scores to describe this trait and to make comparisons between groups of subjects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434180PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01378DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

global scores
20
self-esteem levels
12
levels global
8
rosenberg self-esteem
8
self-esteem scale
8
self-esteem
6
global
5
scores
5
subjects
5
esteem levels
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!