Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) is a condition associated with increased mortality. Even after identifying the condition, the causes are difficult to treat and only partially reversible in end-stage renal disease patients. Thus, the role of more recent hemodialysis (HD) techniques in improving such conditions is an emerging issue. However, major randomized clinical trials have not confirmed the results of smaller observational studies in which online hemodiafiltration has shown some efficacy in improving patients' response to ESAs. In our interpretation, these findings are not in contrast, but they can be explained by a better understanding of the interactions between HD and ESAs on iron mobilization, first of all through the role of hepcidin. The kinetics of hepcidin removal through HD combined with the action of selected ESAs may help the clinician in prescribing the best association between HD treatment and ESAs to overcome hyporesponsiveness.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000485314 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!