Identifying and characterizing treatment-resistant schizophrenia in observational database studies.

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res

Research & Development, H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark.

Published: September 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is diagnosed when a patient fails to respond to two adequate antipsychotic treatments, and a new algorithm was created to identify TRS patients using claims data from Sweden and the U.S.
  • In a study, patients with schizophrenia aged 13 and older were compared to controls, and those identified as having TRS showed worse functioning and more psychiatric issues.
  • The algorithm proved more effective at detecting patients with multiple hospital visits and complex psychiatric conditions, indicating that TRS patients face greater challenges in their treatment.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is clinically defined as failure to respond to two antipsychotics of adequate dose and duration. An algorithm (registry TRS) was developed, for identifying patients with TRS in claim datasets from Sweden and the United States.

Methods: Schizophrenia (SZ) patients aged ≥13 years were identified in both datasets and matched to controls. Patients were identified as having TRS by use of the registry TRS or ≥1 prescription for clozapine or use of other published criteria. The algorithm was compared for sensitivity, and patients with and without TRS were compared for psychiatric and hospital burden and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores. TRS prevalence was not assessed due to lack of clinically validated data to test the specificity of the algorithm.

Results: Swedish registry TRS patients ≤45 years at first SZ diagnosis had significantly lower GAF scores and earlier disease onset than non-TRS patients. SZ patients with higher psychiatric comorbidity and hospital burden were more likely identified as TRS by all algorithms. The registry algorithm was significantly more sensitive to multiple inpatient stays and all psychiatric comorbidities at identifying TRS.

Conclusion: The registry algorithm appeared more sensitive at identifying patients with TRS, who had greater psychiatric and hospital burden.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7938410PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1778DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

registry trs
12
patients trs
12
hospital burden
12
trs
10
treatment-resistant schizophrenia
8
patients
8
identifying patients
8
identified trs
8
psychiatric hospital
8
gaf scores
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!