QSAR/QSPR (quantitative structure-activity/property relationship) modeling has been a prevalent approach in various, overlapping sub-fields of computational, medicinal and environmental chemistry for decades. The generation and selection of molecular descriptors is an essential part of this process. In typical QSAR workflows, the starting pool of molecular descriptors is rationalized based on filtering out descriptors which are (i) constant throughout the whole dataset, or (ii) very strongly correlated to another descriptor. While the former is fairly straightforward, the latter involves a level of subjectivity when deciding what exactly is considered to be a strong correlation. Despite that, most QSAR modeling studies do not report on this step. In this study, we examine in detail the effect of various possible descriptor intercorrelation limits on the resulting QSAR models. Statistical comparisons are carried out based on four case studies from contemporary QSAR literature, using a combined methodology based on sum of ranking differences (SRD) and analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6767540 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/minf.201800154 | DOI Listing |
Clin Orthop Relat Res
October 2024
The Center for Applied Psychometric Research, Educational Psychology Department, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Background: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), such as the Jefferson Scale of Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE) or the Wake Forest Trust in Physician Scale (WTPS), have notable intercorrelation and ceiling effects (the proportion of observations with the highest possible score). Information is lost when high ceiling effects occur as there almost certainly is at least some variation among the patients with the highest score that the measurement tool was unable to measure. Efforts to identify and quantify factors associated with diminished patient experience can benefit from a PREM with more variability and a smaller proportion of highest possible scores (that is, a more limited ceiling effect) than occurs with currently available PREMs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Sex Med
December 2024
Sexual Dysfunction Nucleus, Institute of Psychiatry (IPUB), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22410-003, Brazil.
Background: Receptive vaginal penetration skills have been implicated in the etiology, explanatory models, and treatment of genito-pelvic pain penetration disorder (GPPPD). However, there are no psychometric skills measures designed to screen, assess, and stratify GPPPD.
Aim: We aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate a new scale-the Vaginal Penetration Skills Scale (VPSS)-to screen, assess, and stratify GPPPD.
Front Psychiatry
September 2024
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Introduction: Urgency has been defined as the tendency towards rash speech and behavior in the context of emotion. Measures of Urgency have been found to have robust predictive power for psychopathologies and problematic behaviors. In the current study, we question whether emotions are unique drivers of urgency, or if emotions are potent exemplars of contexts that lead to rash speech and behavior.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIEEE Trans Med Imaging
September 2024
Anomaly detection can significantly aid doctors in interpreting chest X-rays. The commonly used strategy involves utilizing the pre-trained network to extract features from normal data to establish feature representations. However, when a pre-trained network is applied to more detailed X-rays, differences of similarity can limit the robustness of these feature representations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCogn Res Princ Implic
September 2024
Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E BEHS 1003, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
The reliability of cognitive demand measures in controlled laboratory settings is well-documented; however, limited research has directly established their stability under real-life and high-stakes conditions, such as operating automated technology on actual highways. Partially automated vehicles have advanced to become an everyday mode of transportation, and research on driving these advanced vehicles requires reliable tools for evaluating the cognitive demand on motorists to sustain optimal engagement in the driving process. This study examined the reliability of five cognitive demand measures, while participants operated partially automated vehicles on real roads across four occasions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!