In the recent years, the immediate placement of dental implants into fresh extraction sites has become an acceptable treatment approach. However, immediate molar implant placement presents specific challenges because of the anatomical and physiologic limitations. Such implant surgeries commonly require procedures that use a barrier membrane to generate bone and soft tissue or one that seals the molar extraction socket through a coronally advanced flap. Here, as an alternative, we report a method for treating molar extraction socket wounds in the hard and soft tissues after immediate placement of an implant using a silicone sheet.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421788 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3501671 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Perioperative changes in anxiety and comfort in third molar extraction patients sedated with midazolam.
Oral Maxillofac Surg
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nara Medical University, 840, Shijo-Cho, 634-8522, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze changes in anxiety and comfort levels at each perioperative stage during third molar extraction under single-agent intravenous midazolam sedation, and to clarify how these conditions at each perioperative stage affect postoperative satisfaction.
Patients And Method: 115 who requested extraction of 1 ~ 4 third molars under single-agent intravenous midazolam sedation were targeted. These patients were administered a questionnaire survey one week after surgery.
Comparative Evaluation of Canal Transport and Centralization Between ProTaper Next and XP-endo Shaper Systems Using CBCT Analysis: An In Vitro Study.
Int J Dent
January 2025
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
This study compared the apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper Next (PTN) and XP-endo Shaper (XPS) nickel titanium (NiTi) rotary files in curved root canals using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The current in vitro study involved the mesiobuccal canals of mesial roots in 44 extracted mandibular first molars that exhibited apical curvature ranging from 10° to 30°. Two experimental groups were randomly formed from the teeth ( = 22) and subjected to instrumentation with PTN and XPS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBayesian network for predicting mandibular third molar extraction difficulty.
BMC Oral Health
January 2025
Sub-Institute of Public Safety Standardization, China National Institute of Standardization, No.4 Zhichun Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China.
Background: This study aimed to establish a model for predicting the difficulty of mandibular third molar extraction based on a Bayesian network to meet following requirements: (1) analyse the interaction of the primary risk factors; (2) output quantitative difficulty-evaluation results based on the patient's personal situation; and (3) identify key surgical points and propose surgical protocols to decrease complications.
Methods: Relevant articles were searched to identify risk factors. Clinical knowledge and experience were used to analyse the risk factors to establish the Bayesian network.
Comparison of smart burs and chemo-mechanical caries removal systems in primary molars - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent
October 2024
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, D. Y. Patil University School of Dentistry, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Article Synopsis
- Smart burs and chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) systems are alternative techniques for cavity preparation, but existing studies show mixed results regarding their efficacy, efficiency, and patient comfort.
- This systematic review analyzed in vivo studies comparing these methods, excluding lower-quality sources and conducting a thorough risk of bias assessment on the included studies.
- The analysis revealed that, although 154 studies were initially reviewed, only a few were suitable for meta-analysis, showing no significant difference in clinical efficacy between CMCR systems and smart burs.
Second Versus First Molar Extractions in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Outcome Study into Maxillary Canine, Premolar, and Molar Movement.
J Clin Med
January 2025
Radboudumc 3D Lab, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, P. O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
This retrospective longitudinal outcome study comparing orthodontic extraction modalities, including extraction of maxillary first or second molars, aimed to compare the three-dimensional tooth movement of maxillary canines (C), premolars (P1, P2), and molars (M1, M2) in Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with fixed appliances. A sample of 98 patients (mean age 13.20 ± 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!