Gleason score (GS) 8⁻10 is associated with adverse outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). However, biopsy GS (bGS) may be upgraded or downgraded post-radical prostatectomy (RP). We aimed to investigate predictive factors and oncologic outcomes of downgrade to pathologic GS (pGS) 6⁻7 after RP in PCa patients with bGSs 8⁻10. We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of patients with bGS ≥ 8 undergoing RP. pGS downgrade was defined as a pGS ≤ 7 from bGS ≥ 8 post-RP. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis, logistic regression analysis, and Kaplan⁻Meier curves were used to analyze pGS downgrade and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Of 860 patients, 623 and 237 had bGS 8 and bGS ≥ 9, respectively. Post-RP, 332 patients were downgraded to pGS ≤ 7; of these, 284 and 48 had bGS 8 and bGS ≥ 9, respectively. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels; clinical stage; and adverse pathologic features such as extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and positive surgical margin were significantly different between patients with pGS ≤ 7 and pGS ≥ 8. Furthermore, bGS 8 (odds ratio (OR): 0.349, < 0.001), PSA level < 10 ng/mL (OR: 0.634, = 0.004), and ≤cT3a (OR: 0.400, < 0.001) were identified as significant predictors of pGS downgrade. pGS downgrade was a significant positive predictor of BCR following RP in patients with high bGS (vs. pGS 8, hazard radio (HR): 1.699, < 0.001; vs. pGS ≥ 9, HR: 1.765, < 0.001). In addition, the 5-year BCR-free survival rate in patients with pGS downgrade significantly differed from that in patients with bGS 8 and ≥ 9 (52.9% vs. 40.7%, < 0.001). Among patients with bGS ≥ 8, those with bGS 8, PSA level < 10 ng/mL, and ≤cT3a may achieve pGS downgrade after RP. These patients may have fewer adverse pathologic features and show a favorable prognosis; thus we suggest that active treatment is needed in these patients. In addition, patients with high-grade bGS should be managed aggressively, even if they show pGS downgrade.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6518256 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040438 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
July 2024
Pediatrics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Pimpri, Pune, IND.
Background Sepsis poses a critical medical challenge due to its profound systemic inflammatory response, which frequently results in organ dysfunction and high mortality rates, especially in pediatric patients. The condition requires prompt recognition and aggressive management to mitigate its severe outcomes. Methods This prospective study enrolled 248 pediatric patients admitted with sepsis to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at our tertiary care center.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
March 2019
Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
Gleason score (GS) 8⁻10 is associated with adverse outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). However, biopsy GS (bGS) may be upgraded or downgraded post-radical prostatectomy (RP). We aimed to investigate predictive factors and oncologic outcomes of downgrade to pathologic GS (pGS) 6⁻7 after RP in PCa patients with bGSs 8⁻10.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Urol
September 2017
Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address:
Background: According to a recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines update, patients with Gleason score (GS) 3 + 4 prostate cancer (PCa) and "favorable intermediate-risk" (FIR) characteristics might be offered active surveillance (AS). However, the risk of unfavorable disease features and its prediction in this subset of patients is not completely understood.
Objective: To identify the risk of unfavorable disease and potential predictors of adverse outcomes among GS 3 + 4 FIR PCa patients.
Adv Urol
November 2013
Departments of Urology and Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Rua Tessália Vieira de Camargo 126, Cidade Universitária "Zeferino Vaz," 13083-887 Campinas-SP, Brazil.
Background. Protective factors against Gleason upgrading and its impact on outcomes after surgery warrant better definition. Patients and Methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBJU Int
March 2011
Departments of Urology, Pathology, Columbia University Medical CenterDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Objectives: • Gleason sum from prostate biopsy (bGS) is an important tool in classifying severity of disease, ultimately influencing clinical management. • Commonly, pathology specimens are re-evaluated internally prior to surgery. • We evaluate agreement of bGS with prostatectomy Gleason sum (pGS) and the impact of re-grading on prediction of true underlying tumor architecture.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!