A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Relationship between number of contacts between previous dropouts with type 2 diabetes and health care professionals on glycaemic control: A cohort study in public primary health care. | LitMetric

Relationship between number of contacts between previous dropouts with type 2 diabetes and health care professionals on glycaemic control: A cohort study in public primary health care.

Prim Care Diabetes

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Vantaa Health Centre, City of Vantaa, Finland.

Published: October 2019

Aim: Previous study findings have shown that more frequent contacts with the diabetes care team predict better diabetes control. It is unknown whether this is true also for previous dropouts with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of this study was to evaluate if those previous dropouts with T2D who succeeded to improve their glycaemic control had more frequent contacts with health care professionals in the public primary diabetes health care system than those dropouts who did not show improvement.

Methods: In this "real life" retrospective cohort study, we identified 115 dropouts with T2D who were contacted by trained diabetes nurses and who returned to a public T2D-care system. Those previous dropouts who had baseline haemoglobin A ≥53mmol/mol (7%) and had a reduction in HbA≥6mmol/mol (0.5%) during the follow-up were compared with those with unsatisfactory change in HbA (baseline HbA≥53mmol/mol and change <6mmol/mol, or HbA<53mmol/mol at the baseline measurement but above that in the end of the study period) or with those who remained at good glycaemic control over the study period. Trained diabetes nurses collected quantitative data from the patient records about visits and contacts during the follow-up.

Results: Previous dropouts showing improvement had more visits to the diabetes nurse (p=0.003) and other nurses (p<0.001) than those with no improvement or those with satisfactory glycaemic control. Telephone calls not focusing on diabetes (p<0.001) were also more frequent among previous dropouts with improvement than among the others.

Conclusions: Especially previous dropouts with T2D who had poor glycaemic control, may benefit from more frequent contacts including visits and telephone calls. Recalling dropouts does not seem to lead to overuse of the T2D care-system by those recalled patients whose glycaemic control does not require special care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2019.03.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

previous dropouts
16
health care
16
dropouts type
8
type diabetes
8
diabetes health
8
care professionals
8
glycaemic control
8
cohort study
8
public primary
8
frequent contacts
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!