Should His Bundle Pacing Be Preferred over Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Following Atrioventricular Junction Ablation?

Cardiol Clin

Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, Durham VA Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

Published: May 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • - Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) can lead to serious health issues, especially when patients experience rapid ventricular rates (RVR), requiring effective treatment strategies.
  • - Atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation combined with pacemaker implantation is a method used to control heart rates in patients with persistent AF and RVR, but traditional pacing methods, like right ventricular only pacing, can worsen HF.
  • - The review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of two advanced pacing strategies—His bundle pacing (HBP) and biventricular (BiV) pacing—as more effective options for heart failure patients following AVJ ablation.

Article Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are associated with high morbidity and mortality, which is particularly detrimental when patients develop rapid ventricular rates (RVR). Atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation with pacemaker implantation has been used as a method of achieving rate control in patients with incessant AF with RVR. Right ventricular only pacing is known to be harmful in the setting of HF. His bundle pacing (HBP) and biventricular (BiV) pacing both offer durable pacing solutions that offer more physiologic activation. This review describes the benefits and drawbacks of HBP and BiV pacing in HF patients after AVJ ablation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442941PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2019.01.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bundle pacing
8
atrioventricular junction
8
avj ablation
8
biv pacing
8
pacing
5
pacing preferred
4
preferred cardiac
4
cardiac resynchronization
4
resynchronization therapy
4
therapy atrioventricular
4

Similar Publications

Aims: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the efficacy of dual-chamber left Bundle branch pacing (LBBP) as an alternative therapy for heart failure patients with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) and indications for defibrillator with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D).

Methods: 34 patients met inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. These criteria included a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of lower than 35%, a New York Heart Association functional class of II-IV, CLBBB meeting Strauss's criteria, intraventricular dyssynchrony, and confirmed correction of CLBBB during LBBP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area DF-4 Defibrillator Lead Implantation-Feasibility, Procedural Caveats, Safety, and Follow-Up.

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol

January 2025

Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Arrhythmia Heart Failure Academy, The Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Introduction: Permanent implantation of a DF-4 implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) lead in the left bundle branch area (LBBA-ICD) is the next paradigm in amalgamating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and defibrillation. We systematically investigated feasibility/success rate, procedural caveats, and complications associated with a permanent DF-4 LBBA ICD implant and pertinent data at short-term follow-up.

Methods: We prospectively attempted implantation of 7 Fr Durata (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) single coil DF-4 ICD lead at the LBBA using a fixed-curve non-deflectable CPS locator delivery sheath.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!