A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of point-of-care and central laboratory analyzers for blood gas and lactate measurements. | LitMetric

Comparison of point-of-care and central laboratory analyzers for blood gas and lactate measurements.

J Clin Lab Anal

Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cipto Mangunkusumo National Referral Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Published: June 2019

Background: Blood gas analysis and blood lactate measurement have important roles in patient management. Point-of-care (POC) testing simplifies and provides rapid blood gas and lactate measurements. This study aimed to compare pH, pCO , pO , and lactate measurements between a POC device and a benchtop blood gas analyzer typically used in a hospital central laboratory, and to evaluate the inter-device variability of the POC device.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample size of 100. Each sample was measured for pH, pCO , pO , and lactate using a Nova pHOx plus L benchtop blood gas analyzer in the central laboratory and an i-STAT handheld POC device. The results of both devices were compared using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman tests. Testing of the inter-device variability was done by using three different i-STAT devices, and the results were compared statistically.

Results: Strong correlations were observed for all test results. In Bland-Altman analysis, ≥95% of the results were within the limits of agreement, with the exception of lactate, which had only 93%. The results that were beyond the limits were primarily lactate levels >8 mmol/L. Biases between the benchtop analyzer and the i-STAT were not clinically significant, except pH. No significant inter-device variability was observed between the i-STAT analyzers.

Conclusion: This comparison study of pH, pCO , pO , and lactate measurements between Nova pHOx plus L and i-STAT analyzers showed good agreement. However, lactate measurement results >8 mmol/L on the i-STAT analyzer should be interpreted with caution.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595289PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22885DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood gas
20
lactate measurements
16
central laboratory
12
pco lactate
12
inter-device variability
12
lactate
9
gas lactate
8
lactate measurement
8
poc device
8
benchtop blood
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!