Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Blood gas analysis and blood lactate measurement have important roles in patient management. Point-of-care (POC) testing simplifies and provides rapid blood gas and lactate measurements. This study aimed to compare pH, pCO , pO , and lactate measurements between a POC device and a benchtop blood gas analyzer typically used in a hospital central laboratory, and to evaluate the inter-device variability of the POC device.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample size of 100. Each sample was measured for pH, pCO , pO , and lactate using a Nova pHOx plus L benchtop blood gas analyzer in the central laboratory and an i-STAT handheld POC device. The results of both devices were compared using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman tests. Testing of the inter-device variability was done by using three different i-STAT devices, and the results were compared statistically.
Results: Strong correlations were observed for all test results. In Bland-Altman analysis, ≥95% of the results were within the limits of agreement, with the exception of lactate, which had only 93%. The results that were beyond the limits were primarily lactate levels >8 mmol/L. Biases between the benchtop analyzer and the i-STAT were not clinically significant, except pH. No significant inter-device variability was observed between the i-STAT analyzers.
Conclusion: This comparison study of pH, pCO , pO , and lactate measurements between Nova pHOx plus L and i-STAT analyzers showed good agreement. However, lactate measurement results >8 mmol/L on the i-STAT analyzer should be interpreted with caution.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595289 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22885 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!