Purpose: Despite the high prevalence, morbidity, and treatment costs for osteoporosis-related fractures, studies have shown that patients infrequently receive the recommended treatment for low bone density (LBD). This study investigated patient perceptions about evaluation, management, and willingness to pursue osteoporosis treatment to further elucidate potential barriers to LBD treatment.
Methods: A survey was prospectively administered to patients over 50 years old addressing patient history of fragility fractures and osteoporosis evaluation and treatment, medication administration preferences, and willingness to start a new medication to treat or prevent future fragility fractures.
Results: Three hundred twenty-five patients completed surveys (63.1% women, 36.9% men; mean age, 64.1 years). Patients reported the following: 50.8% had taken supplements or medication for LBD. Patients who had never taken LBD prescription medications were asked about their willingness to take these medications if physician-recommended. The mean response on a 0 to 10 scale was 7.3 ± 3.2, which was not significantly different between fracture or bone density subgroups. Several barriers to taking LBD medications were identified: 85.7% said no medical provider had prescribed them; 14.0% stated they already took too many medications; 10.4% were afraid of potential side effects; 4.3% had conflicting provider recommendations; and 1.8% cited financial concerns.
Conclusions: Patients held a favorable opinion on taking LBD medications when prescribed. Although 29.8% of patients had an abnormal dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) result, 85.7% of all patients reported that no medical provider had prescribed LBD medications. A sizeable gap remains between current practice and optimal osteoporosis education and management.
Clinical Relevance: Despite the large reported and increasing prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with upper extremity fragility fractures, the rate of treatment for LBD remains suboptimal.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.01.018 | DOI Listing |
Alzheimers Dement
January 2025
Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Background: We sought to characterize the cognitive profile among individuals with mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB) to help guide future clinical criteria.
Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis included MCI-LB studies with cognitive data from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (January 1990 to March 2023). MCI-LB scores were compared to controls, MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI-AD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) groups with random-effects models.
J Neural Transm (Vienna)
January 2025
Department of Neurology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University of College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
To investigate the clinical impact of mild behavioral impairment (MBI) in a predefined cohort with Lewy body disease (LBD) continuum. Eighty-four patients in the LBD continuum participated in this study, including 35 patients with video-polysomnography-confirmed idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) and 49 clinically established LBD. Evaluations included the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), neuropsychological tests, and MBI Checklist (MBI-C).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFParkinsonism Relat Disord
December 2024
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
Co-morbid Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology (amyloid-beta and tau) is commonly observed in Lewy body dementia (LBD), and this may affect clinical outcomes. A systematic review of the effect of AD co-pathology on longitudinal clinical outcomes in LBD was conducted. A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (October 2024) yielded n = 3558 records that were screened by two independent reviewers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomarkers that aid in early detection of neurodegeneration are needed to enable early symptomatic treatment and enable identification of people who may benefit from neuroprotective interventions. Increasing evidence suggests that sleep biomarkers may be useful, given the bi-directional relationship between sleep and neurodegeneration and the prominence of sleep disturbances and altered sleep architectural characteristics in several neurodegenerative disorders. This study aimed to demonstrate that sleep can accurately characterize specific neurodegenerative disorders (NDD).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neuropathol Exp Neurol
December 2024
Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Although Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) is the most common pathology underlying clinical dementia, the presence of multiple comorbid neuropathologies is increasingly being recognized as a major contributor to the worldwide dementia burden. We analyzed 1051 subjects with specific combinations of isolated and mixed pathologies and conducted multivariate logistic regression analysis on a cohort of 4624 cases with mixed pathologies to systematically explore the independent cognitive contributions of each pathology. Alzheimer disease neuropathologic change and limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE-NC) were both associated with a primary clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) and were characterized by an amnestic dementia phenotype, while only ADNC associated with logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (PPA).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!